What I would like to do is add a second IP to both sys-firewall and
sys-net so that I can NAT traffic from one of my VM's in/out through
these IP's. So what I end up with is two IP's on sys-net, one handling
all the traffic for most of my VM's, the other handling traffic for one
specific VM.
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:20:18 -0400
Ed wrote:
> What I would like to do is add a second IP to both sys-firewall and
> sys-net so that I can NAT traffic from one of my VM's in/out through
> these IP's. So what I end up with is two IP's on sys-net, one
> handling all the traffic for most of my VM'
> What I would like to do is add a second IP to both sys-firewall and
> sys-net so that I can NAT traffic from one of my VM's in/out through
> these IP's. So what I end up with is two IP's on sys-net, one handling
> all the traffic for most of my VM's, the other handling traffic for one
> specific
On 10/06/2017 12:10 PM, Mike Keehan wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to add a second Firewall VM to be used solely
by your special single vm?
Yes I believe this would def work, and also should be automatic/reliable
across reboots, but I was really hoping to not give up 2-4GB of RAM just
for
Assuming you mean a physical interface.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send emai
On 10/06/2017 12:14 PM, filtration wrote:
Can you create another sys-net chain with the second interface? You
could keep things isolated without scripting. Assuming you are using
Qubes 3.2, the interface could be assigned to sys-net-2 via VM
Settings->Devices.
Looks like you and both Mike Kee
Hello,
> I work around the issue by using Remmina (or other RDP client) in an
> appVM, and allowing IP forwarding in the firewall vm. This solution does
> not suffer from increasing lag, and should be usable for everything
> except gaming. See instructions here:
>
Remmina indeed seems to make t
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 12:17:26 -0400
Ed wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 12:10 PM, Mike Keehan wrote:
>
> >
> > Wouldn't it be possible to add a second Firewall VM to be used
> > solely by your special single vm?
> >
>
> Yes I believe this would def work, and also should be
> automatic/reliable across r
On 10/06/2017 03:14 PM, Mike Keehan wrote:
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 12:17:26 -0400
Ed wrote:
On 10/06/2017 12:10 PM, Mike Keehan wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to add a second Firewall VM to be used
solely by your special single vm?
Yes I believe this would def work, and also should be
auto
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 03:41:26PM -0400, Ed wrote:
> On 10/06/2017 03:14 PM, Mike Keehan wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 12:17:26 -0400
> > Ed wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/06/2017 12:10 PM, Mike Keehan wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Wouldn't it be possible to add a second Firewall VM to be used
> > > >
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:41:32PM -0600, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
> On 10/05/2017 01:52 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
> >
> > > Saw the news earlier today about the major dnsmasq vulnerabilities (remote
> > > code execution), and already received the upda
On October 6, 2017 5:05:49 PM MDT, Unman wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:41:32PM -0600, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
>> On 10/05/2017 01:52 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
>> > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Ron Hunter-Duvar wrote:
...
>> > FC23 has been EOL'ed for long time, you should upgrade your
>template to
>> >
Once again, dom0 did not reply. I took this as a sign that the iso was
successfully copied, but the Standalone VM did not register something to boot
from and I could not find it in the dom0 filesystem again. This puzzles me,
because I am sure that the file was originally at the exact location I
Cloning VMs is quite troublesome right now, so it is hard to update Fedora and
Debian in order to use NetworkManager.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
The Control Port is 9051. I’m not sure if that has anything to do with my
problems.
I chose Internal Relaying and started Tor through Arm, but it did not register
that Tor was connected. I still received the bootstrap problem and the qrexec
problem.
--
You received this message because you ar
On 10/06/2017 11:26 PM, Person wrote:
Cloning VMs is quite troublesome right now, so it is hard to update Fedora and
Debian in order to use NetworkManager.
You can easily install the Fedora 25 template that should already have
the correct version of NM:
$ sudo qubes-dom0-update qubes-templa
16 matches
Mail list logo