On Tue, 29 Jan 2019, Alexandre Belgrand wrote:
> Le mardi 29 janvier 2019 à 00:59 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen a écrit :
> > There are many technical reasons raising from plain
> > physics/electronics
> > which make an attack chip of that size with the described
> > capabilities to
> > seem quite utopis
Le mardi 29 janvier 2019 à 00:59 +0200, Ilpo Järvinen a écrit :
> There are many technical reasons raising from plain
> physics/electronics
> which make an attack chip of that size with the described
> capabilities to
> seem quite utopistic (and the article therefore bogus). ...But of
> course
>
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019, Alexandre Belgrand wrote:
> Le lundi 28 janvier 2019 à 13:08 -0800, goldsm...@riseup.net a écrit :
> > I'm intrigued how you know can catagorically state "CAs and GNU/Linux
> > distributions are #1 targets for national
>
> China:
> https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/25/19 2:52 PM, John Goold wrote:
> There is only one issue in my complete transition to a Qubes
> system. This is the first.
>
> When I attempt to add a "New Contact" to Thunderbird's address
> book, the "OK" button will change to show it is se
Le lundi 28 janvier 2019 à 13:08 -0800, goldsm...@riseup.net a écrit :
> I'm intrigued how you know can catagorically state "CAs and GNU/Linux
> distributions are #1 targets for national
China:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2018-10-04/the-big-hack-how-china-used-a-tiny-chip-to-infiltrate
Le lundi 28 janvier 2019 à 13:08 -0800, goldsm...@riseup.net a écrit :
> To Alexandre Belgrand
>
> I'm intrigued how you know can catagorically state "CAs and GNU/Linux
> distributions are #1 targets for national
> intelligence agencies". This is classified information and therefore
> only avai
On 2019-01-28 19:46, billol...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 28, 2019 at 10:27:32 AM UTC-5, gold...@riseup.net wrote:
>> On 2019-01-27 19:15, billol...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 12:22:03 PM UTC-5, unman wrote:
>> >>[snip]
>> >> Qubes provides a framework for using
Le lundi 28 janvier 2019 à 16:47 +0100, qubes-...@tutanota.com a
écrit :
> What do you yourself use?
Hope I can answer too.
I use an X230 with Intel ME disabled from BIOS. It costs about 160€ on
the second hand market and it has pretty decent hardware. Lenovo claims
that Intel ME can be disabled,
On 2019-01-27 14:33, Alexandre Belgrand wrote:
> Le dimanche 27 janvier 2019 à 13:11 +, Holger Levsen a écrit :
>> I *believe* they probably misunderstood evil32.com and it's fallout.
>
> CAs and GNU/Linux distributions are #1 targets for national
> intelligence agencies.
>
> Debian developer
On Monday, January 28, 2019 at 10:27:32 AM UTC-5, gold...@riseup.net wrote:
> On 2019-01-27 19:15, billol...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 12:22:03 PM UTC-5, unman wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >> Qubes provides a framework for using software - it doesn't take away the
> >> onus on user
First visible error on screen:
[FAILED] Failed to start Setup Virtual Console
Second vis error:
[FAILED] Failed to start Show Plymouth Boot Screen.
No problem, eh? Because a few lines later, it prompts me for the passphrase for
the encrypted disk. Awesome.
But every time, as soon as it gets ther
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:46:55AM -0600, Stuart Perkins wrote:
> Up to a certain manufacture, you can go to coreboot and lose the ME entirely.
> After that point, setting the HAP bit may be your best option. We need
> someone to to reverse engineer the ME and implement enough of it in coreboot
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 16:47:08 +0100 (CET)
wrote:
>Jan 27, 2019, 5:04 PM by alexandre.belgr...@mailbox.org:
>
>> Le dimanche 27 janvier 2019 à 16:47 +, unman a écrit :
>>
>>> I'd be interested to know what system has been graced with your
>>> approval.
>>> If you believe all this, then wha
ubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/1f94e8ca-744e-1985-6e30-6e7cf94e8212%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Qubes-HCL-System76-Oryx_Pro-20190128-114149.yml
Description: application/yaml
hi, I accidentaly downloaded and installed the dom0 update from the testing
repo. Is there any way to reverse the action and keep only the stable version?
I already disabled the testing repo in the /etc/yum.repos.d/qubes-dom0.repo
Thank you
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
Jan 27, 2019, 5:04 PM by alexandre.belgr...@mailbox.org:
> Le dimanche 27 janvier 2019 à 16:47 +, unman a écrit :
>
>> I'd be interested to know what system has been graced with your
>> approval.
>> If you believe all this, then what makes you think that national
>> intelligence agencies hav
On 2019-01-27 19:15, billol...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 12:22:03 PM UTC-5, unman wrote:
>>[snip]
>> Qubes provides a framework for using software - it doesn't take away the
>> onus on users to use that software properly, and to ensure they are aware
>> of good practice. (A
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:52:55 +
Mike Keehan wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:29:50 +
> unman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 01:00:15AM -0500, Chris Laprise wrote:
> > > On 01/23/2019 08:15 PM, js...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
> > > > Mike Keehan:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > >
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:16 PM Chris Laprise wrote:
> On 01/27/2019 09:32 AM, Franz wrote:
> > Command `wmctrl -l` gives the following error
> >
> > |Cannot get client list properties. (_NET_CLIENT_LIST or
> _WIN_CLIENT_LIST)|
>
> This works for me with KDE.
>
>
> >
> > But when I use |wmctrl| t
Hello!
I have experienced a couple of times now that my Qubes 4 installation crashes
at different times.
I do not expect this to be an issue with Qubes, but it would be nice if I could
debug this some how. I have no idea where to look for the necessary logs though.
Some details:
The crash itse
20 matches
Mail list logo
