kitchm via Forum:
- Prohibiting top posting is a bad idea because we don't do
that with the e-mail standard.
Email doesn't follow the standard. See
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 3.1.1.
- "However, a Google account is required in order to post
through the web interfaces." You cannot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/02/2019 6.03 PM, unman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:21:53PM -0500, kitchm via Forum wrote:
>> Andrew, thanks for that. Much appreciated.
>>
>> unman, this has nothing whatsoever to do with google groups,
>> and of course should not.
I seem to make something wrong. Here is the output of a failed update.
Any hints?
root@host:~# apt-get-update-plus dist-upgrade
Hit:1 http://deb.qubes-os.org/r4.0/vm stretch InRelease
Hit:2 https://deb.whonix.org stretch InRelease
Hit:3 https://cdn-aws.deb.debian.org/debian-security
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:21:53PM -0500, kitchm via Forum wrote:
> Andrew, thanks for that. Much appreciated.
>
> unman, this has nothing whatsoever to do with google groups,
> and of course should not. Computer users know that to find
> out about a canary, one always goes to the web site. If
@Achim Patzner - noses, Google groups is not intuitive by
any standard. That is a simple fact. And frankly, I don't
understand why you and unman are being just a little too
negative and accusatory. This is a good discussion and it
hits on many parts of the mailing list problem. No one is
Andrew, thanks for that. Much appreciated.
unman, this has nothing whatsoever to do with google groups,
and of course should not. Computer users know that to find
out about a canary, one always goes to the web site. If you
had bothered to learn about how these things work it would
have helped
Some comments based on what has been posted so far:
- Google is never a secure option.
- No one has ever explained how to archive on a local
computer.
- Prohibiting top posting is a bad idea because we don't do
that with the e-mail standard.
- There is nothing wrong with the fact that busy
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 16:19:47 +0100
Nicklas Avén wrote:
>On 2/5/19 3:08 PM, Mike Keehan wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:58:17 +0100
>> Nicklas Avén wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>> I am a new happy Qubes user. Getting almost everything to work on a
>>> Dell 7530 with xeon 2186 and Nvidia P3200.
On 2/5/19 3:08 PM, Mike Keehan wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:58:17 +0100
Nicklas Avén wrote:
Hi
I am a new happy Qubes user. Getting almost everything to work on a
Dell 7530 with xeon 2186 and Nvidia P3200. Qubes 4.01 made things
quite easy :-)
I find Qubes very intuitive to work with,
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 13:58:17 +0100
Nicklas Avén wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I am a new happy Qubes user. Getting almost everything to work on a
> Dell 7530 with xeon 2186 and Nvidia P3200. Qubes 4.01 made things
> quite easy :-)
>
>
> I find Qubes very intuitive to work with, but I have a suggestion
>
Ryzen 5 1500x
Motherboard: Asus b350 M-A AM4
RAM: 16gb
HDD: 1 TB
GPU : Asus gtx 1050 ti
TPM support?
Is this setup good?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
Hi
I am a new happy Qubes user. Getting almost everything to work on a Dell
7530 with xeon 2186 and Nvidia P3200. Qubes 4.01 made things quite easy :-)
I find Qubes very intuitive to work with, but I have a suggestion that I
have no idea if it is easy or hard to do.
It is just a work
12 matches
Mail list logo
