[qubes-users] RE: Qubes 4.1 Archlinux (manual answer for the question by Jon Will)

2020-08-17 Thread 'KnightWhoSaysNeeeowWumPing' via qubes-users
Hello there! First off, I was not able to answer to the mail directly since I just recently subscribed to this mailing list and do not have a google account. But I saw the the mail with the subject Qubes 4.1 Archlinux by Jon Will posted on Saturday, August 15, 2020 at 11:47:02 PM UTC Maybe the

Re: [qubes-users] Qubes dom0-update-guard script

2020-08-17 Thread 54th Parallel
While working on the script, I realized that a much simpler way of achieving the goal of verifying that repomd hasn't been tampered with is to just verify that the repomd.xml used for updating matches the onion version (itself cross-checked against multiple HTTPS copies) before the update, inst

Re: [EXT] Re: [qubes-users] Google requiring login to access qubes-users

2020-08-17 Thread 54th Parallel
On Monday, 17 August 2020 at 08:38:20 UTC+8 Chris Laprise wrote: > The mail-archive site doesn't come up prominently in searches and I even > forgot it existed, but thanks for the reminder. > > The list remains in peoples' minds as being a "Google group" so they are > likely to gravitate toward

Re: [qubes-users] Unable to create set templates as disposable vm templates

2020-08-17 Thread 54th Parallel
On Monday, 17 August 2020 at 05:11:16 UTC+8 Ari wrote: > find templates that fit best with your vm and that u know well, dont look > for templates on the black market and have low ratings > Am I missing something, or is there a sketchy unofficial source for templates with ratings somewhere?

Re: [EXT] Re: [qubes-users] Google requiring login to access qubes-users

2020-08-17 Thread Jarrah
> With the changes in Google Group's interface, I'm tempted to abandon this > place entirely and shift to mail, but for the sake of having more > participants, it'd be nice to have the forum/mailing list somewhere less > restrictive. There was quite a large discussion about this under the subj