[qubes-users] Re: Qubes on Lemur Pro - system 76

I would like to test QUbes on my Lemur Pro but this machine requires a very > recent kernel to work and unfortunately Qubes 4.0.3 can't boot the > machine...Do you have plans to make a new ISO with a fresh kernel (5.6 at > least) > I wrote a guide to how I got Qubes up and running on a Syste

Re: [EXT] Re: [qubes-users] Google requiring login to access qubes-users

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2020-08-18 1:55 AM, Jarrah wrote: > >> With the changes in Google Group's interface, I'm tempted to >> abandon this place entirely and shift to mail, but for the sake >> of having more participants, it'd be nice to have the >> forum/mailing list s

Re: [EXT] Re: [qubes-users] Google requiring login to access qubes-users

54th Parallel: > As someone who has had an open tab on the Google Groups page for a long > time, I want to add that activity has dropped *dramatically* since Google > started mandating logins. Like, it has fallen off a cliff and now the place > has a ghost town vibe to it. I imagine China's p

Re: [EXT] Re: [qubes-users] Google requiring login to access qubes-users

Andrew wrote: >We're actually working on an announcement about this right now. Stay tuned! I see you're very much on top of things. Looking forward to it! On Tuesday, 18 August 2020 at 21:14:07 UTC+8 awokd wrote: > > I imagine China's policy requiring real ID to use the Internet has > Google sa

Re: [qubes-users] How would you remotely infiltrate a default Qubes OS?

This is the real solution for the Intel problem :) https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4318 I believe IBM stated they also have protections against the Rowhammer attacks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [EXT] Re: [qubes-users] Google requiring login to access qubes-users

54th Parallel: (question: would a two trillion ton object the size of an elephant collapse into a black hole?) well, a neutron star is more dense, so i don't think so :) as appealing as the collapse of apple sounds.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Grou

Re: [qubes-users] Qubes Won't Boot with 4.19.125-1 Kernel

I have exactly the same problem with a Librem 15v3 laptop: hangs with blinking cursor. Only boots with 4.19.107. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[qubes-users] open app in a specified workspace

Hello. For example, "qvm-run untrusted google-chrome" opens Chrome browser in the current workspace. How to generalise this command to control the workspace the browser opens in. To be able, for example, open Browser in Workspace2, open TextEditor in Workspace3 by a single script. Thank you. --

Re: [qubes-users] open app in a specified workspace

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:34:21PM +0200, Vadim Tambovtsev wrote: > Hello. > > For example, "qvm-run untrusted google-chrome" opens Chrome browser in the > current workspace. > > How to generalise this command to control the workspace the browser opens > in. To be able, for example, open Browser

Re: [qubes-users] Re: Black Screen when installing 4.0.3 & 4.1 on AMD Ryzen 4750U

> It could be that 5.8 has a fixed amdgpu driver Yeah you could have a point here, looks like 5.8 was pushed to qubes-linux-kernel 12 hours ago. I'll try compile this and see how it goes. On Monda

Re: [qubes-users] How would you remotely infiltrate a default Qubes OS?

On Wednesday, 19 August 2020 at 00:15:08 UTC+8 Robert Spigler wrote: > This is the real solution for the Intel problem :) > > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4318 > > I believe IBM stated they also have protections against the Rowhammer > attacks > I'm all for having Qubes on ppc

Re: [qubes-users] How would you remotely infiltrate a default Qubes OS?

On 8/19/20 6:45 AM, 54th Parallel wrote: On Wednesday, 19 August 2020 at 00:15:08 UTC+8 Robert Spigler wrote: This is the real solution for the Intel problem :) https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4318 I believe IBM stated they also have protections against the Rowhammer attacks