-END PGP SIGNATURE-
not so surprising in Fed28 , FF60, Q4.0, adding this package, attached
the key to the AppVM, logging into webmail (gmail) this does nothing ,
it immediately fails ; however it does work ! in chromium surprise
surprise , now if OTP would work would be nice
On 05/19/18 16:08, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 05:03:11AM -0700,
qubesuzer-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Hello there, I was wondering if there is a workaround to make this work.
I have a Yubikey
On 05/19/18 16:08, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 05:03:11AM -0700,
qubesuzer-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Hello there, I was wondering if there is a workaround to make this work.
I have a Yubikey
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 8:03:11 AM UTC-4, qube...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello there, I was wondering if there is a workaround to make this work.
> I have a Yubikey with U2F, which has the dual purpose of being a normal
> Yubikey as well as being able to do U2F when the webbrowser requests it.
>
On 05/16/18 09:55, Benjamin Mord wrote:
Is this the same as issue 3524?
https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/3524
https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/3612
.I don't think the attachment is the issue, I can attach the
yubikeys, the problem is they aren't operational as
Is this the same as issue 3524?
https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/3524
https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/3612
I am thinking it is different. I am new to Qubes, but it sounds like
no U2F-specific
sanitizing proxy exists, and like this is what is being proposed. I wonder
On 05/15/18 18:09, qubesque-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 12:03:11 PM UTC,
qube...-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
Hello there, I was wondering if there is a workaround to make this work.
I have a Yubikey with U2F, which has the dual
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 at 12:03:11 PM UTC, qube...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hello there, I was wondering if there is a workaround to make this work.
> I have a Yubikey with U2F, which has the dual purpose of being a normal
> Yubikey as well as being able to do U2F when the webbrowser requests it.
>
