Ryan * wrote:
> On Dec 23, 10:09 am, "David J Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> this-bit.nor-this-bit.co.uk> wrote:
[]
>> http://www.david-taylor.myby.co.uk/software/disk.html#TinyBen
[]
>
> Worked perfectly. Thanks!
Thanks, Ryan.
It came as a result of also having a speaking-clock program, and havin
On Dec 23, 10:09 am, "David J Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
this-bit.nor-this-bit.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Ryan,
>
> My Tiny Ben (as opposed to Big Ben) program should be within about 100msec
> or so.
>
> http://www.david-taylor.myby.co.uk/software/disk.html#TinyBen
>
> Cheers,
> David
Worked perfectly. Th
"Aggarwal Vivek-Q4997C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje news:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> Hi
> Iam planning to have NTP Server for something around 50,000 Clients in
> the Network
If you are being to deploy NTP to 50,000 clients, perhaps you'd better to put
your routers (sure you don't have o
> The odd thing is, the GPS 18 LVC ran fine for a few weeks with the
receiver
> inside, when it suddenly stopped getting any signal. After that, I
mounted
> it on a bracket about a foot outside the window, where it ran fine for
about
> three months. Now the signal is intermittent, although most o
Hal Murray wrote:
>> I have yet to move the GPS 18 LVC around to see if I can get a better signal
>>from somewhere else. It's just odd that it would work fine for a number of
>> months as is and then all of a sudden stop receiving a steady signal.
>
> Did your weather change? Our rainy season
David Woolley wrote:
>> allowing the load to evenly distribute among the servers in the pool.
>> In this case the client will send NTP requests to the same host but
>> get NTP responses from physically different servers. All servers in
>> the pool peer with one another.
>
> If you can make this so
Ryan * wrote:
> Every clock program or display tried with XP seems to update at
> somewhat random intervals. Some updates will be a second or more slow
> and other wont be quite as much. Is there something out there that
> will display something closer to the system clock that's being
> maintained
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tom Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Per Hedeland wrote:
>> Well, I guess I'm also still wondering whether the
>> latter is actually saying that it won't be possible to get the skew
>> below 20 ms with Unix hosts with 100Hz clocks, but it's not really
>> important -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Dec 17, 9:04 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hal
> Murray) wrote:
>> I think something in that area was fixed a while ago, but I
>> don't remember the details and I could easily be wrong.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure you aren't the first person to ask a question like
>> that.
>>
>> Wh
Every clock program or display tried with XP seems to update at
somewhat random intervals. Some updates will be a second or more slow
and other wont be quite as much. Is there something out there that
will display something closer to the system clock that's being
maintained via NTP? Realistically I
Per Hedeland wrote:
> Well, I guess I'm also still wondering whether the
> latter is actually saying that it won't be possible to get the skew
> below 20 ms with Unix hosts with 100Hz clocks, but it's not really
> important - the important thing is that such a statement (if made) is
> not correct.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tom Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Per Hedeland wrote:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny
>> Mayer) writes:
>>> Per Hedeland wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tom Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rick Jones wrote:
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
