Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread Harlan Stenn
Does http://support.ntp.org/Support/TroubleshootingNTP#Section_9.4. have the information you are looking for? -- Harlan Stenn http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member! ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listi

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread David J Taylor
"Harlan Stenn" wrote in message news:ywn9skb612pt@ntp1.isc.org... > Does http://support.ntp.org/Support/TroubleshootingNTP#Section_9.4. have > the > information you are looking for? That's an excellent start, Harlan, but it leaves me with a little confusion * the source you are sync

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread David Woolley
G8KBV wrote: > A silly question if I may, and yes I've been poking arround the Meinberg > website and forum for hours, and can't find the answer. Likewise the > (non existant) help within the program, though I'm *sure* I've seen text > on this somewhere, but can't find it at the moment. These

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread G8KBV
In article , daveh...@gmail.com says... > > On Dec 20, 00:32 UTC, G8KBV wrote: > > But what does 'o' mean? > > It means the PPS peer, and when present effective trumps any * seen. > > > The "Application Log" shows:- > > Using user-mode PPS timestamp for GPS_NMEA(2)  Not that I think it'll > > ma

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread G8KBV
In article , da...@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid says... > > G8KBV wrote: > > > A silly question if I may, and yes I've been poking arround the Meinberg > > website and forum for hours, and can't find the answer. Likewise the > > (non existant) help within the program, though I'm *sure* I've seen

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread G8KBV
In article , david- tay...@blueyonder.delete-this-bit.and-this-part.co.uk.invalid says... > > > Hi All.. > [] > > Re the status column in the 'NTP Status' tab. > [] > > But what does 'o' mean? > > "o" - appears to mean - "synced to the "atom" (PPS) driver", which is > filtering the clock from th

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread G8KBV
In article , st...@ntp.org says... > > Does http://support.ntp.org/Support/TroubleshootingNTP#Section_9.4. have the > information you are looking for? Yes it does Harlan. Site/page bookmarked! Dave Baxter. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.n

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread Gene
On Dec 19, 6:32 pm, G8KBV wrote: > Hi All.. > > A silly question if I may, and yes I've been poking arround the Meinberg > website and forum for hours, and can't find the answer.  Likewise the > (non existant) help within the program, though I'm *sure* I've seen text > on this somewhere, but can't

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread G8KBV
In article <7044cbe1-a247-4921-a392-ee0b1dd5a705 @g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, eugene...@sbcglobal.net says... > > On Dec 19, 6:32 pm, G8KBV wrote: > > Hi All.. > > > > A silly question if I may, and yes I've been poking arround the Meinberg > > website and forum for hours, and can't find the a

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread David J Taylor
> Device Mangler just reports the standard MS driver for that port, also > not reflecting the actual currently in use baud rate settings either, so > nothing new there. (I've never yet seen that tool actualy reflect what > the actual conditions are, on 2k or XP!) Then the device driver isn't inst

[ntp:questions] NTP 4.2.6p1-RC1 Released

2009-12-20 Thread NTP Public Services Project
Redwood City, CA - 2009/12/20 - The NTP Public Services Project (http://support.ntp.org/) is pleased to announce that NTP 4.2.6p1-RC1, a Release Candidate of the NTP Reference Implementation from the NTP Project, is now available at http://www.ntp.org/downloads.html and http://support.ntp.org/downl

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread G8KBV
In article , david- tay...@blueyonder.delete-this-bit.and-this-part.co.uk.invalid says... > > > Device Mangler just reports the standard MS driver for that port, also > > not reflecting the actual currently in use baud rate settings either, so > > nothing new there. (I've never yet seen that tool

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread David J Taylor
> Your confused!... > > How are you getting to those driver display details? > > In Win2k, I'm going in via the control panel, system, then device > manager. > > In there, expand the "Ports (COM and LPT)" selection, select Com2 (the > one with the GPS) right click, Properties, Driver, Driver detail

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread Harlan Stenn
David, Yes, the content could easily be improved. And it's a wiki. -- Harlan Stenn http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member! ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions

Re: [ntp:questions] Meinberg NTP monitor, silly question

2009-12-20 Thread David J Taylor
"Harlan Stenn" wrote in message news:ywn9oclt49tl@ntp1.isc.org... > David, > > Yes, the content could easily be improved. And it's a wiki. I would have a go at that, but as I am uncertain about things myself, it won't be until after those more knowledgeable folk have explained further. Ch

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP reachable but rejected

2009-12-20 Thread Moses Truong
> > Dave Hart wrote: > > ntpq told you the key piece of information with "flash=400 peer_dist," > -- in that version of ntpd, flash=400 is associated with the peer > distance test, which is looking at a peer_distance calculation based > on the rootdelay and rootdispersion peer variables, as well as