In article ,
unruh wrote:
> On 2010-09-13, Joseph Gwinn wrote:
> > Unruh,
> >
> > In article ,
> > unruh wrote:
> >
> >> On 2010-09-13, David L. Mills wrote:
> >>
> > [snip]
> >>
> >> > ... And, by the way, mail sent to your alleged mail address is
> >> > returned to sender as undeliverab
In article <1f42m7-7gr2@ntp.tmsw.no>,
Terje Mathisen <"terje.mathisen at tmsw.no"> wrote:
> Joseph Gwinn wrote:
> > The address did not look munged to me either. It makes perfect sense for a
> > physicist to name servers after physics objects.
> >
> > The standard approach is to put the demu
Miroslav,
You don't need a week for that, since the anticipated intercept is in
the order of 200 s (trace 3). However, plots such as these are really
susceptible to little hidden resonances, so I tend to prefer a long tail
and lots and lots of samples. For comparison, the averaging time for PP
Miroslav,
I think we are talking right past each other. Both Chrony and NTP
implement the clock discipline using a second-order feedback loop that
can minimize error in both time and frequency, although each uses a
different loop filter. Chrony uses a least-squares technique; NTP uses a
tradi
Joseph Gwinn wrote:
The address did not look munged to me either. It makes perfect sense for a
physicist to name servers after physics objects.
The standard approach is to put the demunging instructions in your sig. Like:
"Please remove reference to the entrance to a worm's burrow from email a
On 2010-09-13, Joseph Gwinn wrote:
> Unruh,
>
> In article ,
> unruh wrote:
>
>> On 2010-09-13, David L. Mills wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> > ... And, by the way, mail sent to your alleged mail address is
>> > returned to sender as undeliverable.
>>
>> Yes, I am sorry about that but it is done
Unruh,
In article ,
unruh wrote:
> On 2010-09-13, David L. Mills wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> > ... And, by the way, mail sent to your alleged mail address is
> > returned to sender as undeliverable.
>
> Yes, I am sorry about that but it is done in order to slightly reduce
> the spam I get. It shou
Michael,
sorry for the late reply.
Michael Nielsen wrote:
> Here are some more details from the ntp logging - ntp_mon peerstats..
>
> It's doesn't seem to be a interrupt creep, as the server is maintaining
> time properly all day, except for 30 mins each day.
So once again this meets perfectly
Redwood City, CA - 2010/09/11 - The NTP Public Services Project
(http://support.ntp.org/) is pleased to announce that NTP 4.2.6p3-beta1,
a Beta Release of the NTP Reference Implementation from the
NTP Project, is now available at http://www.ntp.org/downloads.html and
http://support.ntp.org/download
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 08:48:58PM +, David L. Mills wrote:
> Miroslav,
>
> I've done this many times with several machines in several places
> and reported the results in Chapter 12 and 6 in both the first and
> second editions of my book, as well as my 1995 paper in ACM Trans.
> Networking.
On 2010-09-13, David L. Mills wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Please reread the definition of Allan deviation. It is a measure of
That makes no difference to the intercept and simply adds a constant slope of -1
to the graph. And note that the most common use of ntp is to discipline
the time, not the frequen
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:10:08PM +, David L. Mills wrote:
> A previous message implied that, once the Allan characteristic was
> determined, it would show chrony to be better than ntpd. Be advised
> the default time constant (at 64 s poll interval) was specifically
> chosen to match trace 1 o
12 matches
Mail list logo
