Versions: System is debian Lenny, ntp is version
'1:4.2.4p4+dfsg-8lenny3'
I've followed the rabbit hole as far as I can. Can someone point me in
the right direction from here?
Martin, I don't know whether it will help, but the current stable version
of NTP is now 4.2.6p3, form:
Inspired by http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/Sure-GPS.htm and
http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/MG1613S/ I ordered one of these
boards, at a total cost of about $40 including shipping from Hong Kong.
It arrived after a week or so, and so far both USB and RS232 simply
works. :-)
Receiver
Thank you for your answer. Yes, that was something I considered. However, there
is no newer Version in lenny-backports, and I have shied away from building it
myself (additional error potential and all that.)
Anyway, I just found my mistake:
In my client config I had the lines:
keysdir /etc/ntp
Rick,
All the Spectracom WWVB and GPS receivers use the same serial protocol;
I have had one or more of these things running for almost 30 years. The
Netclock/2 is useless without its ferrite-stick loop antenna, and even
then the rising noise pollution due to the noisy electrical grid and
Thank you for your answer. Yes, that was something I considered.
However, there is no newer Version in lenny-backports, and I have shied
away from building it myself (additional error potential and all that.)
Anyway, I just found my mistake:
[]
Thank you for your help!
Considering I know
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Uwe Klein
uwe_klein_habertw...@t-online.de wrote:
IMHO most leveragers of VMs don't understand what happens in
their loved sandbox which completely destroys the
notion of a controlled and escape proof environment
No, we do, it's just that 20:1 server
RPM writes:
As for your notion of safety when running on a real physical
server... have you ever audited the code of your BIOS? Or the firmware
on your chipsets, NICs, RAID cards, or disk drives? Your control of
a physical server is just as illusory as that of a Virtual Machine.
The hardware
Parvin, Richard wrote:
I run Symmetricom S300.
I would like to use Sysplex to manage the time on my mainframes.
Could someone point me to some documentation?
How much are you paying researchers?
justfuckinggoogleit.com
symmetricom.com/resources/compliance-certifications/sysplex-timer
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Ryan Malayter malay...@gmail.com wrote:
. have you ever audited the code of your BIOS? Or the firmware
on your chipsets, NICs, RAID cards, or disk drives? Your control of
a physical server is just as illusory as that of a Virtual Machine.
Yes, Linux, after the
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:47 AM, John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com wrote:
RPM writes:
What's baffling, though, is why you need to add an entire virtual
machine and operating system just to run another process.
The problem is Windows does not multitask well. I've been told you
can't expect to
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:44 AM, David L. Mills mi...@udel.edu wrote:
Rick,
All the Spectracom WWVB and GPS receivers use the same serial protocol; I
have had one or more of these things running for almost 30 years. The
Netclock/2 is useless without its ferrite-stick loop antenna, and even
@Chris
I appreciate the offer to help.
I've been thinking about this problem a while and here are my thoughts... It
seems to me that ntpd has the goal of keeping extremely accurate time - which
is important for many obvious reasons. However there are those of us that
don't need time accurate
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Ralph ra...@depth.net wrote:
@Chris
I appreciate the offer to help.
I've been thinking about this problem a while and here are my thoughts... It
seems to me that ntpd has the goal of keeping extremely accurate time - which
is important for many obvious
13 matches
Mail list logo
