jclerm...@gmail.com wrote:
Can someone explain why this was done?
(Shrug)
If they were pool clocks, anything is possible,
occasionally the date appears to change on some of them.
--
E-Mail Sent to this address blackl...@anitech-systems.com
will be added to the BlackLists.
xsiu...@gmail.com wrote:
att just doesn't have much of a clue, when it comes to
Network Time.
For a long time, it has appeared that they don't have clues,
or don't care about lots of things. {Whats new?}
for years, they had clocks running on NIS+ servers,
mainly to keep time in sync on
welcome to online jobs.
--
the job in which you can earn !
the job in which you can work from anywhere !
the job in which you can work at your convinient !
--
here, you can find lot of earning oppurtunities like email
On 01/08/12 04:40, jclerm...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, this affected us. Can someone explain why this was done? Was
it designed to be a test of some kind? The Linux leap second kernel
bug that was discovered a month ago was only patched on July 17; that
patched kernel has presumably not made it
David Taylor wrote:
I have information on my Web site on the easy-to-use Sure GPS, as well
as the low-cost Garmin GPS 18x LVC.
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/Sure-GPS.htm
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/FreeBSD-GPS-PPS.htm
Mine are using simple puck antennas, indoors, on the top floor of a
On 01/08/2012 10:15, Terje Mathisen wrote:
[]
This summer I received two more SURE boards, it took about an hour total
to solder on the two required patch wires on each of them.
(I used David's pictures to remind me where to put the patch wires!)
Together with a pair of old laptops (with
On 01/08/2012 09:46, Hahn, Ron wrote:
Colleagues,
I have been working for some time now trying to get four different Asus Atom
motherboards to successfully work as a NTP stratum 1 server. I am using the
FreeBSD 8.3 OS with PPS compilation in the kernel, and the ntp-devel port
(4.2.7p2??
On 01/08/12 10:28, Marco Marongiu wrote:
I tried to collect some information around the globe, but with scarce/no
feedback. I am *suspecting* that this could be a rather imaginative
attempt to DOS worldwide.
Anyway, a colleague of mine is now hunting down some upstreams that
faked the leap
On 2012-08-01, Hahn, Ron ron.h...@fmr.com wrote:
Colleagues,
I have used exactly the same recipe on a Core 2 Duo Tyan server and
the times are maximally off by only +4uS/-2uS from PPS. So I am
thinking there is something fundamental wrong with the Atom boards.
I have repeated the
On 01/08/12 14:58, Marco Marongiu wrote:
Question now is: assuming those servers were running ntpd, was such a
bug reported at some point?
Plus, another question. If one uses the leapfile, are spurious leap
second notifications like this one discarded?
From the docs at
I've seen no evidence of a denial of service attack, bugs are more likely.
Several stratum one servers have been advertising LI=1 continuously for
the past month. Others alternate between LI=0 and LI=1.
Most servers claim to run ntpd.
There are over 10 stratum one's that advertise LI=1 as of
Hi, I tried to find some info because there was other leap second, but I didn't
find anything about this issue. Does somebody has some info what happened or
know if it was a DOS atack or if it was a problem of the ntp services (I'm
using the ntp Dabian pools)?
Thanks in advance
On 2012-08-01, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Kennedy, Paul p.kenn...@fugro.com.auwrote:
Exactly so. you can purchase a GPS receiver for well under $100 connect
it to a serial port + pps on any of the pc's and have microsecond
accuracy in a
On 2012-08-01, Terje Mathisen terje.mathisen at tmsw.no wrote:
David Taylor wrote:
I have information on my Web site on the easy-to-use Sure GPS, as well
as the low-cost Garmin GPS 18x LVC.
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/Sure-GPS.htm
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp/FreeBSD-GPS-PPS.htm
Mine
Tom,
I am thinking, is the D510MO a single core or double core CPU? The Atom CPU I
have been using are all double core.
R
-Original Message-
From: questions-bounces+ron.hahn=fmr@lists.ntp.org
[mailto:questions-bounces+ron.hahn=fmr@lists.ntp.org] On Behalf Of Thomas
Laus
All Serial ports are spec'd for RS232 voltage levels but many of then will
still work on TTL levels.My guess (I'm guessing because you don't say)
is that you are feeding the serial port a TTL level signal.The Core 2
Duo might be fine with this but perhaps the Atom board need real rs232
and
steven Sommars stevesommars...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen no evidence of a denial of service attack, bugs are more likely.
Several stratum one servers have been advertising LI=1 continuously for
the past month. Others alternate between LI=0 and LI=1.
Most servers claim to run ntpd.
There
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Hahn, Ron ron.h...@fmr.com wrote:
Tom,
I am thinking, is the D510MO a single core or double core CPU? The Atom
CPU I have been using are all double core.
I use the same board. It is a dual core CPU. I got it because (1) has
real serial ports and (2) it
The main standard says a leap second is allowed in any month. That's what
the reference ntpd does.
See ITU-R, TF460, STANDARD-FREQUENCY AND TIME-SIGNAL EMISSIONS.
This link may work:
http://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/tf/R-REC-TF.460-6-200202-I!!PDF-E.pdf
On the other hand Bulletin C
Chris,
Thank you for these helpful advises. I am recalling many years ago there were
such things as line transceivers that converted the signals from TTL-RS232 and
backwards. Do these still exist in the world and have you perhaps these part
numbers? I am thinking this is the only thing left
All,
I found that: http://www.greyware.com/kb/kb2012.717.asp
One of my internal NTP servers has the leap flag set to 01. The fake leap
second issue was produced in the servers where this NTP server is the time
source preferred, so I guess that it was my problem.
In order to check the leap
There are over 10 stratum one's that advertise LI=1 as of Wed Aug 1
14:18:51 UTC 2012. Unless this changes another false leap second could
occur on August 31, 2012
Steven, can you point me to one of those servers? The ones that I've checked
all seem to have LI=0.
Thanks!
P.
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 7:33:25 AM UTC-7, steven Sommars wrote:
I've seen no evidence of a denial of service attack, bugs are more likely..
Several stratum one servers have been advertising LI=1 continuously for
the past month. Others alternate between LI=0 and LI=1.
Most
Hi all,
Marco Marongiu wrote:
Hi all
This is just to warn you that there are now some NTP servers around the
globe spreading a leap second announcement for tomorrow 00:00:00 UTC
(so, basically, in a few hours now).
If you didn't take action before the leapocalypse last month, you better
Hahn, Ron wrote:
Thank you for these helpful advises. I am recalling many years ago there were
such things as line transceivers that converted the signals from TTL-RS232 and
backwards. Do these still exist in the world and have you perhaps these part
numbers? I am thinking this is the only
Sorry for jumping in so late.
In my opinion the basic concept of the local clock driver was good, easy to
configure, sufficient for small, simple networks, and it just worked as
expected in older versions of ntpd.
As David Woolley has pointed out in one of his comments, the local clock can
If you can, get a high speed scope (10MHz) and put it on the end of the
line and see what voltages are coming out of the line to the serial
port. You might find it is only a volt or less which is not enough to
drive the latches.
On 2012-08-01, Hahn, Ron ron.h...@fmr.com wrote:
Chris,
Thank
On 2012-08-01, Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
All Serial ports are spec'd for RS232 voltage levels but many of then will
still work on TTL levels.My guess (I'm guessing because you don't say)
is that you are feeding the serial port a TTL level signal.The Core 2
Duo
Martin Burnicki wrote:
It turned out this happened with some older versions of
ntpd when the customers had installed e.g. 3 or 4 servers
for redundancy, and each NTP server had the other ones
configured as upstream server (personally I know this is
not a good configuration, but they did
On 2012-08-01, Hahn, Ron ron.h...@fmr.com wrote:
Chris,
Thank you for these helpful advises. I am recalling many years ago
there were such things as line transceivers that converted the
signals from TTL-RS232 and backwards. Do these still exist in the
world and have you perhaps these part
Martin Burnicki wrote: If in current versions of ntpd the local clock stays
selected as system peer after the daemon has started even
though good upstream time sources are available, or if it
eats up the -g flag after startup so ntpd terminates
itself when remote servers become available
On 2012-08-01, Hahn, Ron ron.h...@fmr.com wrote:
the PPS pulse width. Maybe with the Fat PPS board? This is reminding
me of the old days. Printers and Terminals! :)
Ron:
All of my TAPR boards also drive the RS-232 PPS pin with a 'low-z' output.
They use 4 sections in parallel from a 74AC04N
Once upon a time, Marco Marongiu brontoli...@gmail.com said:
This is just to warn you that there are now some NTP servers around the
globe spreading a leap second announcement for tomorrow 00:00:00 UTC
(so, basically, in a few hours now).
I'm still seeing leap=01 from 204.235.61.9
33 matches
Mail list logo
