On 2013-09-19, Riccardo Castellani ric.castell...@alice.it wrote:
I converted physical machine to virtual one, where there is NTPd service.
My
ESX host is running several guest OS included this NTP server.
Can it be this
one the problem ? Virtualization ? I'd like to know if ntpd adjusts
On 19/09/13 06:41, Riccardo Castellani wrote:
one the problem ? Virtualization ? I'd like to know if ntpd adjusts only OS
time or it adjust hardware clock too.
ntpd only adjusts the software clock, however, the guest OS may well try
to update the hardware clock. Normal VM hosts will
On 18/09/2013 23:09, unruh wrote:
[]
Well, there is a problem. You said that you had seen all of your S1
servers suddenly declare that the time was 1982 and presumably that the
times were very close (to less than a second). They would then form a
group of servers which could well outvote the
David Woolley wrote:
The basic problems with running ntpd on VMs are that
simulated real time
can run at variable rates, compared with true real time,
and there can
be large scheduling delays, which compromise the accuracy of
offset measurement.
What means simulated real time can run at
Do you think it's good idea install time server into guest Linux machine ?
I
read something time and I think to use physical machine, it's right ?
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Riccardo Castellani ric.castell...@alice.it wrote:
I converted physical machine to virtual one, where there is NTPd service.
My
ESX host is running several guest OS included this NTP server.
Can it be this
one the problem ? Virtualization ? I'd like to know if ntpd adjusts only OS
time or
Well, there is a problem. You said that you had seen all of your S1
servers suddenly declare that the time was 1982 and presumably that the
times were very close (to less than a second). They would then form a
group of servers which could well outvote the S2s that are delivering
the
-Original Message-
From: questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org
[mailto:questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org] On
Behalf Of Rob
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 4:27 AM
To: questions@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re:
Horvath Bob-BHORVAT1 bob.horv...@motorolasolutions.com wrote:
Please read the knowledge base article on the VMware site for a full
explanation of how it works and what you can configure.
I think the confusing aspect to many is that the recommendations from VMware
are to run NTP on the guests
-Original Message-
From: questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org
[mailto:questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org] On
Behalf Of Rob
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 11:20 AM
To: questions@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re:
Horvath Bob-BHORVAT1 bob.horv...@motorolasolutions.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org
[mailto:questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org] On
Behalf Of Rob
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013
On 2013-09-19, Maria Iano ma...@iano.org wrote:
Thank you all for your responses, this has been very helpful. I have
an additional question now, which is once I have this all set up with
the S1 and S2 servers, should I then point the clients to only the S2
servers? Currently they point to our
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-09-19, Horvath Bob-BHORVAT1 bob.horv...@motorolasolutions.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org
[mailto:questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org]
On
On 2013-09-19, Horvath Bob-BHORVAT1 bob.horv...@motorolasolutions.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org
[mailto:questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org] On
Behalf Of Rob
Sent: Thursday,
Thank you all for your time and expertise. I feel confident about the design
now. This list has been really helpful.
Maria
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
What means simulated real time can run at variable rates
?!
This is explained in one of the early VMWare white papers on timing (at
the time they were recommending using VMWare Tools to control the guest
time and synchronising the host. There seem to have been changes since,
but I
On 2013-09-19, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-09-19, Horvath Bob-BHORVAT1 bob.horv...@motorolasolutions.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: questions-bounces+bob.horvath=motorolasolutions@lists.ntp.org
unruh un...@invalid.ca ha scritto nel messaggio
news:xzI_t.106385$_q4.85...@fx01.iad...
vers is the same.
It seems to now, and then that machine becomes loaded, with one of the
other virtual machine taking up loads of time, and suddenly your time
has gone to hell. This is how you want a
18 matches
Mail list logo
