Re: [ntp:questions] Red Hat vote for chrony

2014-12-08 Thread Charles Swiger
On Dec 8, 2014, at 12:04 PM, Phil W Lee wrote: >> With air-conditioning on, the temperature change shrinks to about 5C, >> which reduces the thermal wandering of the XO by a factor of 2. That >> seems to be a worthwhile improvement, not "largely irrelevant". > > Of course, server class machines

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP roadmap (was Re: Poul-Henning Kamp and re-write of NTP)

2014-12-08 Thread William Unruh
On 2014-12-09, skillz...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, December 7, 2014 7:25:01 PM UTC-8, Harlan Stenn wrote: >> Rob writes: >> > David Woolley wrote: >> > > It starts off a bit badly by talking about the size of nptd, when, in >> > > fact, very little of ntpd is actually involved in the core al

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP roadmap (was Re: Poul-Henning Kamp and re-write of NTP)

2014-12-08 Thread skillz...@gmail.com
On Sunday, December 7, 2014 7:25:01 PM UTC-8, Harlan Stenn wrote: > Rob writes: > > David Woolley wrote: > > > It starts off a bit badly by talking about the size of nptd, when, in > > > fact, very little of ntpd is actually involved in the core algorithm. > > > Most of it, I guess, is reference

Re: [ntp:questions] Number of Stratum 1 & Stratum 2 Peers

2014-12-08 Thread William Unruh
On 2014-12-08, Brian Utterback wrote: > On 12/4/2014 6:56 PM, William Unruh wrote: >> One source is fine, unless it either dies or goes nuts. >> Two are fine, unless on goes nuts. > Define "goes nuts". Two are not fine if they don't agree on the time, > and in my experience the many of the admins

Re: [ntp:questions] Number of Stratum 1 & Stratum 2 Peers

2014-12-08 Thread Mike Stump
In article , David Woolley wrote: >On 02/12/14 01:59, edstu...@gmail.com wrote: > >> At the same time, we want drift less than 1 second. However, over > >Drift is a pure number. If you ever get a time error of more than >100ms, ntpd is in severe distress. On a computer with a blocked fan, ther

Re: [ntp:questions] Number of Stratum 1 & Stratum 2 Peers

2014-12-08 Thread Brian Utterback
On 12/4/2014 6:56 PM, William Unruh wrote: One source is fine, unless it either dies or goes nuts. Two are fine, unless on goes nuts. Define "goes nuts". Two are not fine if they don't agree on the time, and in my experience the many of the admins that consider using only two servers are unable

Re: [ntp:questions] Number of Stratum 1 & Stratum 2 Peers

2014-12-08 Thread E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Martin Burnicki wrote: > If the connection from your local site to the internet > has the asymmetry then *each* NTP server at a remote site > has the same additional systematic offset, > so if you use more than 2 they can overvote your local NTP servers. > > One of our customers had such a case,

Re: [ntp:questions] Default total number of servers NTP wants to have when using pool .....

2014-12-08 Thread Paul
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:27 PM, David Taylor < david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid> wrote: > When using the pool directive, NTP tries to get a certain total number of > servers. What is that number, please (I don't know where to find it in the > source code). I'm seeing a total of 9 servers,

Re: [ntp:questions] Red Hat vote for chrony

2014-12-08 Thread Charles Swiger
On Dec 8, 2014, at 9:19 AM, William Unruh wrote: >> Data point: for a normal desktop machine I have at home, which has a >> 95W TDP i5 CPU and a 145W 970 GPU, I can see a ~12C temperature change >> on the motherboard temp sensor between idle and full load on both as the >> total system draw goes

[ntp:questions] Default total number of servers NTP wants to have when using pool .....

2014-12-08 Thread David Taylor
When using the pool directive, NTP tries to get a certain total number of servers. What is that number, please (I don't know where to find it in the source code). I'm seeing a total of 9 servers, with ten lines in the ntpq -pn output, one line being the pool directive itself. Is that correct

Re: [ntp:questions] Red Hat vote for chrony

2014-12-08 Thread William Unruh
On 2014-12-08, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Dec 7, 2014, at 7:19 PM, William Unruh wrote: >>> I suspect most people are a bit more likely to use air conditioning to >>> control ambient >>> temperature changes then they are to desolder and swap out their crystals >>> in the >>> hopes of obtaining

Re: [ntp:questions] Red Hat vote for chrony

2014-12-08 Thread Charles Swiger
On Dec 7, 2014, at 7:27 PM, William Unruh wrote: > On 2014-12-07, Charles Swiger wrote: >> On Dec 6, 2014, at 8:33 AM, William Unruh wrote: >>> On 2014-12-06, Charles Swiger wrote: [ ... ] >> Dude, give it a rest. You've just acknowledged that the chrony docs at the >> URL >> ending with "man

Re: [ntp:questions] Red Hat vote for chrony

2014-12-08 Thread Charles Swiger
On Dec 7, 2014, at 7:19 PM, William Unruh wrote: >> I suspect most people are a bit more likely to use air conditioning to >> control ambient >> temperature changes then they are to desolder and swap out their crystals in >> the >> hopes of obtaining more precise timekeeping > > Actually ai

Re: [ntp:questions] Red Hat vote for chrony

2014-12-08 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 03:35:10PM -0500, Paul wrote: > On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, William Unruh wrote: > > > And in my tests 10 years ago or so, I used a local gps clock to test the > > ability of chrony and ntpd to discipline a computer clock networked to > > another server which was disc

Re: [ntp:questions] Red Hat vote for chrony

2014-12-08 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 03:27:15AM +, William Unruh wrote: > On 2014-12-07, Charles Swiger wrote: > > Yes, so chrony recommends using maxpoll=4 to the LAN, and not only to local > > refclocks. > > No, read the chrony docs. the default is maxpoll 10 minpoll 5. The default minpoll is 6 and m

Re: [ntp:questions] Poul-Henning Kamp and re-write of NTP

2014-12-08 Thread Paul
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:46 AM, David Woolley < david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> wrote: > There is a lot of confusion in the community about this because of the > concept of a system peer, and simplistic explanations of what this means. Yet I wouldn't expect phk to have a simplistic understanding

Re: [ntp:questions] Poul-Henning Kamp and re-write of NTP

2014-12-08 Thread Paul
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:46 AM, David Woolley < david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> wrote: > [Note: your news client failed to add a References header.] It's a mail client (I'm on the list because of the Google Groups problem some time back) . ___ question

Re: [ntp:questions] Poul-Henning Kamp and re-write of NTP

2014-12-08 Thread Martin Burnicki
Paul wrote: I asked before but I'll try again since "tsc" has come up. Mills says (Mitigation Rules and the prefer Keyword): "The clock combine algorithm uses the survivor list to produce a weighted average of both offset and jitter. Absent other considerations discussed later, the *combined off

Re: [ntp:questions] Poul-Henning Kamp and re-write of NTP

2014-12-08 Thread David Woolley
On 08/12/14 04:08, Paul wrote: I asked before but I'll try again since "tsc" has come up. Mills says (Mitigation Rules and the prefer Keyword): "The clock combine algorithm uses the survivor list to produce a weighted average of both offset and jitter. Absent other considerations discussed later

Re: [ntp:questions] Red Hat vote for chrony

2014-12-08 Thread detha
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 09:46:35 +, David Woolley wrote: > On 07/12/14 09:08, detha wrote: >> More and more of those servers end up being virtualized. Quicker >> reaction to virtualization funnies, and faster convergence on VMs that >> are spun up/down on demand, seem to be one of the main reasons

Re: [ntp:questions] Number of Stratum 1 & Stratum 2 Peers

2014-12-08 Thread Martin Burnicki
Phil W Lee wrote: Martin Burnicki considered Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:15:31 +0100 the perfect time to write: You may run into problems if your WAN connection has asymmetric delays, and thus to 2 servers on the WAN *seem* to have the same offset which differs from the offset provided by the 2 servers

Re: [ntp:questions] NTP roadmap (was Re: Poul-Henning Kamp and re-write of NTP)

2014-12-08 Thread Harlan Stenn
Marco Marongiu writes: > On 08/12/14 04:00, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > Several more volunteers (coders and sysadmin typs) would be great, > > too. > > Can you please elaborate on what kind of help do you need from sysadmin > folks, please? We have equipment in 4 locations at the moment. Folks comfo