You can set the AD servers to get their time from NTP as well. The
systems you need to get NTP time will then be in sync with the AD
servers and those that get their time from AD will be within the 5
minutes needed by Kerberos.
James
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:42 AM, the.loqui...@gmail.com
On 2015-02-17 10:42, the.loqui...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, my employer has a single AD domain where devices
joined to it get their time via the domain server.
However, we are looking at starting to configure
some of these devices to get their time via NTP.
My concern here is if there is a
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
As I said I have six machines, one of which is at home over an cable
modem line, all getting their time from chrony on a server. No trouble
whatsoever, and I have never had any. This suggests that there is
something else going on. Now, I do not have the
On 16/02/2015 19:54, Paul wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:57 AM, David Taylor
david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
For me, there are two show-stoppers with Chrony:
- no support for standard NTP monitoring commands.
- no support for ref-clocks on Windows.
Like many others, I have
On 2015-02-16, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-15, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
I am experimenting with chrony 1.31 as an alternative on some PPS
synchronized servers. It appears to run OK, it is tracking very nicely:
Reference ID:
Hi,
Currently, my employer has a single AD domain where devices joined to it get
their time via the domain server. However, we are looking at starting to
configure some of these devices to get their time via NTP. My concern here is
if there is a sufficiently significant time differential
On 2015-02-17, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
As I said I have six machines, one of which is at home over an cable
modem line, all getting their time from chrony on a server. No trouble
whatsoever, and I have never had any. This suggests that there is
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
On 15/02/15 22:40, Rob wrote:
it is tracking very nicely
Tracking what?
The PPS signal.
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 07:19:39PM +, Rob wrote:
The PPS refclock has changed is refid from PPP0 to PPP1 with this version.
That is a bug, the refid numbering wasn't supposted to change in the
new version. Fixed in git. Thanks.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
