I'm working on an NTP infrastructure project and trying to demonstrate the
benefits of bare metal (vs VMs running the same OS)for commodity lower-stratum
servers...but am having a hard time quantifying the difference.
For example, here are two nodes in the same subnet and with the same upstream
Perhaps the fact that the DNS query would result in more than one answer made
the gethost* call behave differently from apparmor's perspective. You could
simulate the "server" behavior by trying a "pool" directive to a list
containing only one host to see if it behaves differently.
Dan
- O
rently
> returning the IPv4 mapped equivalent. Does anyone know how to force
> just IPv6 addresses?
>
> -Robert Scott
> Hopkins, MN
>
> ___
> questions mailing list
> questions@lists.ntp.org
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/
that have a lstint many days ago.
>
> So my question is: How can I get a number of the "most recent" clients,
> i.e., clients that have a lstint < 2000 or the like. (One bad approach
> might be to use the mrulist output and to grep all lines th
I'm working on deploying a private "pool" system that will allow any ntpd
client in my company to use a single directive for config (this is thousands of
hosts). The intent is to allow the round-robin nature of multiple A records in
DNS naturally distribute the load across several of around 10 d
wers based on location, "score",
etc. I really just can't afford to blackhole the hosts that can't reach my
resolvers on TCP53, hence the "break it into smaller chunks" aspect. 3 smaller
DNS lookups instead of 1
594
You can get all the useful raw data and present/use it however you like. Here's
a good reference to the available monitoring statistics:
http://doc.ntp.org/4.2.4/monopt.html
Dan
--
Dan Geist dan(@)polter.net
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
have something like timemaster running. It manages multiple
time protocol sources (like ntp, p2p...) and rewrites configs for them as
needed.
Dan
--
Dan Geist dan(@)polter.net
- On Aug 2, 2017, at 5:48 PM, Kevin Chan ksc...@mit.edu wrote:
> I'm on an imx233 arm processor using De
Hi, Philippe. First, off, the following pages are very useful for understanding
security controls in detail:
https://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/AccessRestrictions
https://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/accopt.html
I'll try to answer the questions:
a) Generally, it looks pretty good. You
uld you do it ? Do you have any pointers to reference NTP architectures
> ?
>
> Thank you for your help
>
> Youssef Ghorbal
> ___
> questions mailing list
> questions@lists.ntp.org
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
--
Dan Geist dan(@)polter.net
(33.942962,-84.312118)
http://www.polter.net
(404)786-6206
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
- On Jul 2, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Youssef Ghorbal
wrote:
> Good question indeed. I'd say that I want both for my internal pool (S2
> servers)
> (as accurate as possible and also accurate with respect to each other.)
> Regarding actual clients, I'd say that I want them to be only accurate with
RTG and Perl - run on Linux.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> David
> Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
>
> ___
> questions mailing list
> questions@lists.ntp.org
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
--
Dan Geist
_
- On Aug 24, 2020, at 11:46 AM, Jakob Bohm jb-use...@wisemo.com.invalid
wrote:
> On 2020-08-24 16:07, William Unruh wrote:
>> On 2020-08-24, Jakob Bohm wrote:
>>> On 2020-08-24 12:51, Beth Connell wrote:
Hi,
I'm struggling to find any information on where the free NTP servers are
13 matches
Mail list logo
