On 2011-09-01, Miguel Gon?alves m...@miguelgoncalves.com wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for your reply. My comments bellow.
On 1 September 2011 18:24, unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
On 2011-09-01, Miguel Gon?alves m...@miguelgoncalves.com wrote:
Hi all!
I have two internal FreeBSD with
On 2 September 2011 07:56, unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Nope.
It is completely unclear to me what your question is. Your 10.0.2.254 is
an outside switch.
I had several questions in my first message. Your assumption is wrong.
You are telling me that a switch I installed in my
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:50:05AM +0100, Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
I found out the problem and just for the record I'll explain...
The offset is larger than the delay because NTPd is using 10.0.2.254 (more
on this switch later) as a time source and it shouldn't because it has two
local
2011/9/2 Miguel Gonçalves m...@miguelgoncalves.com:
$ ntpq -p 10.0.2.2; ntpdc -c kerninfo 10.0.2.2
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
jitter
==
+10.0.2.10 .GPS. 1 u
On 2011-09-02, Miguel Gon?alves m...@miguelgoncalves.com wrote:
On 2 September 2011 07:56, unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Nope.
It is completely unclear to me what your question is. Your 10.0.2.254 is
an outside switch.
I had several questions in my first message. Your
On 2011-09-02, Miguel Gon?alves m...@miguelgoncalves.com wrote:
Very good point really. This is probably why the FreeBSD machine performs
better than the Linux one. The FreeBSD is embedded and doesn't produce a lot
of heat while the Linux one is a Dell regular server. Perhaps removing the
lid
Hi all!
I have two internal FreeBSD with GPS receivers attached (Garmin 18 LVC:
10.0.2.10 / Sure Evaluation Board:10.0.2.9). Both machines are on the same
LAN segment (VLAN).
For redundancy, I've configured a Cisco switch as a stratum 2 server. Here's
the relevant information:
$ ntpq -pcrv
On 2011-09-01, Miguel Gon?alves m...@miguelgoncalves.com wrote:
Hi all!
I have two internal FreeBSD with GPS receivers attached (Garmin 18 LVC:
10.0.2.10 / Sure Evaluation Board:10.0.2.9). Both machines are on the same
LAN segment (VLAN).
For redundancy, I've configured a Cisco switch as a
Miguel Gonçalves wrote:
Are my GPS clocks OK? Does this happen due to the network latency? Are my
stratum 2 servers OK?
They are well within the allowable error bands, given the measured root
delay. That's about all one can say. as the error bands are about +/-
32 ms!
The delays are due
Hi!
Thanks for your reply. My comments bellow.
On 1 September 2011 18:24, unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
On 2011-09-01, Miguel Gon?alves m...@miguelgoncalves.com wrote:
Hi all!
I have two internal FreeBSD with GPS receivers attached (Garmin 18 LVC:
10.0.2.10 / Sure
Miguel Gonçalves m...@miguelgoncalves.com wrote:
unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
Miguel Gonçalves m...@miguelgoncalves.com wrote:
...
For redundancy, I've configured a Cisco switch as a stratum 2 server.
Here's the relevant information:
$ ntpq -pcrv 10.0.2.254
remote
On 2011-09-01, Miguel Gon?alves m...@miguelgoncalves.com wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for your reply. My comments bellow.
On 1 September 2011 18:24, unruh un...@wormhole.physics.ubc.ca wrote:
On 2011-09-01, Miguel Gon?alves m...@miguelgoncalves.com wrote:
Hi all!
I have two internal FreeBSD with
12 matches
Mail list logo
