Thanks very much to Uwe, Duncan and Seth (who replied off the list).
Uwe - That section of the R for Windows FAQ was very useful - thanks!
Sorry I posted a question involving C/Fortran to R-Help.
Duncan - Thanks for all the useful info. I've bookmarked the pages you
sent me.
Seth - Thanks for
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 9/9/05, Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In R 2.2.0 I find that even if I use \dontshow in the examples section
of an .Rd file that the code still shows.
Has anyone else seen this?
Are there any packages that use this facility that I could
try in order
The configure script runs fine, but when I compile todays alpha version
of R-2.2.0 (R-alpha_2005-09-10_r35546.tar.gz) under FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT
from Sept. 4th I get the following output:
[...]
gcc -I../../src/extra/zlib
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to be installed to localtexmf.
Unfortunately, the changes are not compatible with other TeX packages,
so if
James Wettenhall wrote:
Thanks very much to Uwe, Duncan and Seth (who replied off the list).
Uwe - That section of the R for Windows FAQ was very useful - thanks!
Sorry I posted a question involving C/Fortran to R-Help.
Duncan - Thanks for all the useful info. I've bookmarked the pages
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:33:03 -0700 (PDT),
Thomas Lumley (TL) wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
I personally put NEWS, WISHLIST and THANKS files in the 'inst'
directory of all my source packages. This has the effect of copying them
to the
top level of the
Gabor Grothendieck writes:
On 9/9/05, Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In R 2.2.0 I find that even if I use \dontshow in the examples section
of an .Rd file that the code still shows.
Has anyone else seen this?
Are there any packages that use this facility that I could
try
Thomas Lumley writes:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
How about if there were just a standard location and name such as inst/NEWS,
inst/WISHLIST, inst/THANKS (which has the advantage that they are
automatically
made available in the built package under the current way
On 9/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:33:03 -0700 (PDT),
Thomas Lumley (TL) wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
I personally put NEWS, WISHLIST and THANKS files in the 'inst'
directory of all my source packages. This has
On 9/10/05, Kurt Hornik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas Lumley writes:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
How about if there were just a standard location and name such as
inst/NEWS,
inst/WISHLIST, inst/THANKS (which has the advantage that they are
automatically
made
On 9/10/05, Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/10/05, Kurt Hornik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabor Grothendieck writes:
On 9/9/05, Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In R 2.2.0 I find that even if I use \dontshow in the examples section
of an .Rd file that the
On 9/10/05, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to be installed to localtexmf.
Unfortunately, the
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 9/10/05, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to be installed to localtexmf.
On 9/10/05, Frank E Harrell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would vote for allowing a URL or external file name in in DESCRIPTION,
whose contents could be automatically displayed for the user when
needed. Our changelogs are automatically generated by CVS and are on
the web.
Normally I would
On 10 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the suggestion about using a Changelog (or whatever it would
be called) field in the package DESCRIPTION meta-data. If we have
that, we could not only use this for repository-side presentation of
the package, but also install such info and have
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Frank E Harrell Jr wrote:
I would vote for allowing a URL or external file name in in DESCRIPTION,
whose contents could be automatically displayed for the user when
needed. Our changelogs are automatically generated by CVS and are on
the web.
Yes, this would be nice.
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Seth Falcon wrote:
For what its worth, I don't like this idea of adding a ChangeLog field
to the DESCRIPTION file.
Agreeing upon a standard location for NEWS or CHANGES or some such
seems a more simple solution. As long as the presence of such a file
is *optional*. And
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 9/10/05, Frank E Harrell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would vote for allowing a URL or external file name in in DESCRIPTION,
whose contents could be automatically displayed for the user when
needed. Our changelogs are automatically generated by CVS and are on
the
On 9/10/05, Thomas Lumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
And one more comment. The DESCRIPTION file does not record the
location or existence of the various subdirectories such as R, man,
exec, etc. If NEWS is to be recorded as a meta data line
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 9/10/05, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 9/9/05, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just committed some changes to allow R to be built and to use
MikTeX without needing the Rd.sty files to be installed to localtexmf.
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 9/10/05, Thomas Lumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
And one more comment. The DESCRIPTION file does not record the
location or existence of the various subdirectories such as R, man,
exec, etc. If
21 matches
Mail list logo
