Re: [Rd] Importing from a package with dependencies

Disregard. I found the problem. A stray "require" statement I didnt find on the first pass through the code. On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 6:03 PM, steven mosher wrote: >  I needed to do a little cleanup on my packages ( before trying > Rd2Roxygen) and that involved > switching some packages from my

[Rd] Importing from a package with dependencies

I needed to do a little cleanup on my packages ( before trying Rd2Roxygen) and that involved switching some packages from my Depends list to Imports. Specifically, I had a dependency on "R.utils", but since I only used one or two functions (gunzip ) I thought it best to importFrom("R.utils",gunz

Re: [Rd] Please explain your workflow from R code -> package -> R code -> package

I create & maintain all my packages using the 'mvbutils' package. Documentation in plain-text format (not Rd) is stored along with each function definition--- so when you edit your function, its doco is right there too, and it looks like proper documentation, not code-comments or quasi-Latex. Th

Re: [Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

Hello, On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:14:07PM -0500, David B. Dahl wrote: > Hello, > > Regarding whether xtable is still maintained, yes, but at a minimal level. > I am committed to ensuring that it passes the tests on the latest version > of R, but I am having difficulty finding the time and intere

Re: [Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:24:49AM -0700, Spencer Graves wrote: > On 9/10/2011 10:19 AM, oliver wrote: > >On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:40:24AM -0700, Spencer Graves wrote: > >> > >>On 9/10/2011 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: > >>> > >>>On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder

Re: [Rd] Please explain your workflow from R code -> package -> R code -> package

Thanks, I was too lazy to even look for it. On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Joshua Ulrich wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:23 AM, steven mosher > wrote: >> All I need now is a tool to go through the 4 packages I already >> created without Roxygen and  spit out source files with the Roxyge

Re: [Rd] Please explain your workflow from R code -> package -> R code -> package

Exactly. Rd2roxygen is proud to be a member of the "Lazy Ally", and tries to make diligent developers lazier... Although it does not guarantee a perfect transition from Rd to roxygen (be sure to check out the documentation), it should be able to save you a considerable amount of time. Regards, Yih

[Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

Hello, Regarding whether xtable is still maintained, yes, but at a minimal level. I am committed to ensuring that it passes the tests on the latest version of R, but I am having difficulty finding the time and interest in incorporating new features. So, I'd be very glad if someone would like to

Re: [Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

I think posting this to R-devel was a good idea. In any case, the new maintainer should be aware about the many dependencies and that she or he should be careful not to break code of others when updating. Thank you for your contributions!!! Best wishes, Uwe Ligges On 10.09.2011 19:14, Dav

Re: [Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:19 PM, oliver wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:40:24AM -0700, Spencer Graves wrote: >> >> >> On 9/10/2011 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: >> > >> > >> >On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote: >> >>Hi, >> >> >> >>I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively

Re: [Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

On 9/10/2011 10:19 AM, oliver wrote: On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:40:24AM -0700, Spencer Graves wrote: On 9/10/2011 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote: Hi, I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively being maintained? The last update to the CRA

Re: [Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:40:24AM -0700, Spencer Graves wrote: > > > On 9/10/2011 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: > > > > > >On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively being > >>maintained? The last update to the CRAN was abo

Re: [Rd] control list gotcha

On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:31 PM, John C Nash wrote: > This is mainly a reminder to others developing R packages to be careful not > to supply > control list items that are not used by the called package. Optimx is a > wrapper package > that aims to provide a common syntax to a number of existin

Re: [Rd] Please explain your workflow from R code -> package -> R code -> package

On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:23 AM, steven mosher wrote: > All I need now is a tool to go through the 4 packages I already > created without Roxygen and  spit out source files with the Roxygen > comments in them... > > really lazy. > > That's what Rd2roxygen does... Best, -- Joshua Ulrich | FOSS

[Rd] control list gotcha

This is mainly a reminder to others developing R packages to be careful not to supply control list items that are not used by the called package. Optimx is a wrapper package that aims to provide a common syntax to a number of existing optimization packages. Recently in extending optimx package I

Re: [Rd] Please explain your workflow from R code -> package -> R code -> package

All I need now is a tool to go through the 4 packages I already created without Roxygen and spit out source files with the Roxygen comments in them... really lazy. On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote: >> | In other languages, I've seen to write the documentation inside the >

Re: [Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

I would be leery of just taking over as maintainer if a package still works and passes all checks on CRAN. My personal take is that even commercial packages ignore feature requests, and to expect such from an OSS one is expecting too much. Of course patches are welcomed, but they can't honestly be

Re: [Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

On 9/10/2011 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote: Hi, I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively being maintained? The last update to the CRAN was about 2 years ago. Earlier in the year I found I wanted to use the short caption option of LaT

Re: [Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote: Hi, I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively being maintained? The last update to the CRAN was about 2 years ago. Earlier in the year I found I wanted to use the short caption option of LaTeX tables to display an abridged title in my

[Rd] Is xtable still being maintained?

Hi, I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively being maintained? The last update to the CRAN was about 2 years ago. Earlier in the year I found I wanted to use the short caption option of LaTeX tables to display an abridged title in my table of contents. It was a relatively s

Re: [Rd] Please explain your workflow from R code -> package -> R code -> package

On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote: > It's not the cool kids who are doing this, it's the lazy kids ;) laziness being one of the three virtues of a programmer. The other two being hubris and something else I don't have time to look up at the moment. library(fortunes) fodder: