Sorry for the version mess; here are the versions I've got installed
and on which I can reproduce the core dump:
C:\>R --version
R version 3.2.5 (2016-04-14)
Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
Running under: Windows 7 x64 (build 7601) Service Pack 1
C:\>R --version
R version 3.3.0 RC (2016
The following core dumps R 3.2.5, R 3.3.0 RC and R devel on Windows.
I have tried to use a minimal setup (for all versions tested), i.e.
C:\> cd C:\
C:\> set PATH=C:\PROGRA~1\R\R-33~1.0RC\bin
C:\> set R_DEFAULT_PACKAGES=base
C:\> R --quiet --vanilla
> close(fifo("foo.tmp", open="wb"))
[core dump]
From the first page of the NEWS file:
(2016-04-29 r70564)
isSymmetrix(m) is much faster for large asymmetric matrices m via pre-tests and
a
new option tol1 (with which strict back compatibility is possible but not the
default).
It probably should be
isSymmetric
signature.asc
Description: Mes
Thanks, I am working on fixing this. Something went wrong with the
website regeneration.
Michael
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Spencer Graves
wrote:
> Hello:
>
>
>
> I just failed in my attempts to access R-Journal. "r-project.org"
> include a link to "The R Journal" plus another sayin
Hello:
I just failed in my attempts to access R-Journal. "r-project.org"
include a link to "The R Journal" plus another saying, "The R Journal
Volume 7/2 is available." Both link to
"https://journal.r-project.org/";, which seems not to include a link to
the any issues of R Journal or
Thanks, Luke, for having a look to it.
Sure, I can give you some reproducible example -- even in two degrees of
completeness ;-): see below.
Thanks again, Peter
%---
(I) first example
%---
Just to reproduce the error, on r-devel, tr
Can you provide a complete reproducible example?
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 1, 2016, at 6:51 AM, Peter Ruckdeschel
> wrote:
>
> Hi r-devels,
>
> we are seeing a new problem with our packages RobAStRDA (just new on CRAN,
> thanks
> to Uwe and Kurt!) and RobExtremes (to be submitted).
>
> I
Hi r-devels,
we are seeing a new problem with our packages RobAStRDA (just new on CRAN,
thanks
to Uwe and Kurt!) and RobExtremes (to be submitted).
It must be something recent with the way you internally treat/store byte-code
compiled
functions, as we have no problems with R-3.1.3, but do see a
