Re: [Rd] True length - length(unclass(x)) - without having to call unclass()?

2018-09-10 Thread Iñaki Ucar
El lun., 10 sept. 2018 a las 14:18, Tomas Kalibera () escribió: > > On 09/05/2018 11:18 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > The bottomline here is that one can always call a base method, > > inexpensively and without modifying the object, in, let's say, > > *formal* OOP languages. In R, this is not possible

Re: [Rd] True length - length(unclass(x)) - without having to call unclass()?

2018-09-10 Thread Tomas Kalibera
On 09/05/2018 11:18 AM, Iñaki Ucar wrote: The bottomline here is that one can always call a base method, inexpensively and without modifying the object, in, let's say, *formal* OOP languages. In R, this is not possible in general. It would be possible if there was always a foo.default, but primit