Re: [Bioc-devel] set.seed and BiocParallel

I think Kylie is saying that she wants to use the same seed for each feature across different runs, but the seed can be different across features - which would make more sense. Multi-worker reproducibility is an issue that we discussed before (the link goes into the middle of the thread):

Re: [Bioc-devel] set.seed and BiocParallel

But why do you want the same seed for the different features? That is not the right way to use stochastic methods. Best, Kasper On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 5:20 PM Bemis, Kylie wrote: > Hi all, > > I remember similar questions coming up before, but couldn’t track any down > that directly pertain

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

My fault as I habe not spotted that. Can you pls resubmit as we do no longer have your original submission yet? Best, Uwe Ligges On 13.03.2019 00:10, Τόλης Χαλκής wrote: The name of the package is "volesti". Both checks returned two Notes and we "replied to all" to the e-mail  in order to

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

The name of the package is "volesti". Both checks returned two Notes and we "replied to all" to the e-mail in order to explain why we believe it were both false positives. Best, Chalkis Apostolos On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 00:27, Uwe Ligges wrote: > Not normal, if you tell us which package you

Re: [Rd] R cairo_pdf function does not respect plotting boundaries

Hi I have committed this fix to r-devel (r76226). Please let me know if this does not fix things for you. Paul On 5/03/19 8:22 PM, Lee Steven Kelvin wrote: Hi Paul, Great, thank you for looking in to this, and I'm glad that you're able to reproduce it at your end too. From your reply,

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

Not normal, if you tell us which package you are talking about, the CRAN team can check what happened in case you did not simply forget to confirm your submission. Best, Uwe Ligges On 12.03.2019 21:30, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP

[Bioc-devel] set.seed and BiocParallel

Hi all, I remember similar questions coming up before, but couldn’t track any down that directly pertain to my situation. Suppose I want to use bplapply() in a function to fit models to many features, and I am applying over features. The models are stochastic, and I want the results to be

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server: ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/ /Henrik On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote: Dear all, We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got a positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this normal? Is there any way to get informed for the review process? Did you get the two

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

Sounds like it fell through the cracks somewhere. The foghorn package is a convenient way to check on CRAN status. On 2019-03-12 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote: > Dear all, > > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

Dear all, We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got a positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this normal? Is there any way to get informed for the review process? Best regards, -Chalkis Apostolos [[alternative HTML version

Re: [Rd] Spurious warning from checkReplaceFuns about a non-replacement function

> Hugh Parsonage writes: > If a function contains the pattern `<-` it is (with a few exceptions) > deemed to be a replacement function and in particular must have second > argument `value` to pass R CMD check. > Consider the function %<->% or any other function containing <- within > grapes.

Re: [Bioc-devel] Package missing in BiocCredentials app

Hi Markus, How about now, I just gave you permissions. You should be able to see it in the app, and get access to it. Best, Nitesh > On Mar 11, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Markus Riester wrote: > > Hi, > > an old data package of mine (curatedBladderData) is not showing up in my > BiocCredentials

[Rd] Ellipsis and dot-dot-number [Re: Dots are not fixed by make.names()]

> Kirill Müller > on Fri, 8 Mar 2019 22:26:17 +0100 writes: > Kirill Müller > on Fri, 8 Mar 2019 22:26:17 +0100 writes: > Hi > In addition to the inconsistency in make.names(), the text in ?Reserved > seems incomplete: > "Reserved words outside

[Bioc-devel] Package missing in BiocCredentials app

Hi, an old data package of mine (curatedBladderData) is not showing up in my BiocCredentials account (markus.ries...@novartis.com). Is it possible to link this package to my account? Thank you, Markus ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list