Re: [R-pkg-devel] BH windows compilation issues in R devel

thanks for the quick response Dirk, I did more digging and found that the error is caused by a single line (in bold bellow, commenting it out and defining log_lik = 0 does not trigger the error) but I have absolutely no idea why it is creating the problems #include "DTboost.h" #include #include

Re: [R-pkg-devel] BH windows compilation issues in R devel

On 19 January 2021 at 21:51, Frantisek Bartos wrote: | I wanted to submit a new version of my package and I encountered issues | with boost when compiling it on R devel version for windows. (Please excuse | my stupidity, but I'm a complete noob in regards to compilers and C++) | | A full error

[R-pkg-devel] BH windows compilation issues in R devel

Hi all, I wanted to submit a new version of my package and I encountered issues with boost when compiling it on R devel version for windows. (Please excuse my stupidity, but I'm a complete noob in regards to compilers and C++) A full error stack is accessible here (the Debian one worked without

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Solaris x68 and C++17

Thank you for the quick response and the information. For some reason the Solaris results have now disappeared completely from the check results page. (Now there are some additional issues I have to look into.) I will wait for the rest of the checks to complete and might write a similar shell

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Solaris x68 and C++17

On 19 January 2021 at 17:45, Florian Rupprecht wrote: | Hello, | | the CRAN checks show an error for my newly released package 'httpgd' with | 'r-patched-solaris-x86': | | Error: C++17 standard requested but CXX17 is not defined | | It seems like 'rcppsimdjson' had the same problem ( |

[R-pkg-devel] Solaris x68 and C++17

Hello, the CRAN checks show an error for my newly released package 'httpgd' with 'r-patched-solaris-x86': Error: C++17 standard requested but CXX17 is not defined It seems like 'rcppsimdjson' had the same problem ( https://github.com/eddelbuettel/rcppsimdjson/issues/7) and worked around it by

[Bioc-devel] Change of package mantainer/manager

Dear community, I would like to transfer rexposome and omicRexposome management to one of my colleagues since I am no longer a member of the institution owning the packages. Can someone explain to me the steps to make this change? Kinds regards, ~Cales --- Carles Hernandez-Ferrer Bioinformatic

[Bioc-devel] Bioconductor Developers Forum - 21st January

Dear all, The next Bioconductor Developers' Forum is this Thursday 21st January at 09:00 PST / 12:00 EST / 18:00 CET - You can find a calendar invite attached and at *https://tinyurl.com/BiocDevel-2021-01 * - This month we will hear from Jass Bagga and

Re: [Rd] sorting bug in R-devel?

base::icuSetCollate might be what you need. There are some decent examples in the manual page on it. On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 7:30 AM Thierry Onkelinx via R-devel wrote: > > Dear Peter, > > Thanks for the feedback on the locale. Is there a better alternative for > the C locale? One that yields a

Re: [Rd] sorting bug in R-devel?

Dear Peter, Thanks for the feedback on the locale. Is there a better alternative for the C locale? One that yields a consistent and stable sorting independent of the R version and OS. Best regards, Thierry ir. Thierry Onkelinx Statisticus / Statistician Vlaamse Overheid / Government of

Re: [Rd] sorting bug in R-devel?

Not sure what happened between 4.0.2 and -devel, but you are using C collation, which assumes 7-bit single-byte characters, to sort multi-byte 8-bit encoded characters, which looks a bit risky. -pd > On 19 Jan 2021, at 10:10 , Thierry Onkelinx via R-devel > wrote: > > Dear all, > > My

[Rd] sorting bug in R-devel?

Dear all, My git2rdata package relies on a stable sorting. I've noticed that some characters get a different position under R-devel under Windows 10. This is why the unit test of my package only fail in this combination (https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_git2rdata.html) Below