Re: [Bioc-devel] Rhtslib on arm64

2023-06-07 Thread Martin Grigorov
Hi Ulrich, The issue with the LOCK files and folders have been addressed with https://github.com/Bioconductor/BBS/pull/291 https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.17/bioc-mac-arm64-LATEST/Rhtslib/kjohnson2-install.html says "This page was generated on 2023-06-02 11:02:20". I guess the issue will

Re: [Bioc-devel] Rhtslib on arm64

2023-06-07 Thread bodenhofer
Great, Martin, thanks! Best regards, Ulrich From: Martin Grigorov Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 12:04 PM To: bodenho...@bioinf.jku.at Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org; Hervé Pagès Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Rhtslib on arm64 Hi Ulrich, The issue with the LOCK files and folders have been

[Bioc-devel] Rhtslib on arm64

2023-06-07 Thread bodenhofer
Dear Hervé, dear Rhtslib developers, dear BioC core team, I am regularly checking all BioC check results in order to make sure that I do not miss any issues of the four Bioconductor packages that I am maintaining. It seems that the ‘podkat’ package in BioC 3.17 release has not been built for

Re: [Rd] codetools wrongly complains about lazy evaluation in S4 methods

2023-06-07 Thread Gabriel Becker
The API supported workaround is to call globalVariables, which, essentially, declares the variables without defining them (a distinction R does not usually make). The issue with this approach, of course, is that its a very blunt instrument. It will cause false negatives if you accidentally use

Re: [Rd] codetools wrongly complains about lazy evaluation in S4 methods

2023-06-07 Thread Serguei Sokol via R-devel
Le 03/06/2023 à 17:50, Mikael Jagan a écrit : In a package, I define a method for not-yet-generic function 'qr.X' like so:     > setOldClass("qr")     > setMethod("qr.X", signature(qr = "qr"), function(qr, complete, ncol) NULL) The formals of the newly generic 'qr.X' are inherited from the