Dear List,
I have embedded an R interpreter into an application. This works very
well until now.
As a next step, I would like to make the 'browser()' debugging
infrastructure available. Currently, I am executing R code running
'try_eval'. My main application blocks until the try_eval termina
rom being garbage collected.
D.
Bernd Schoeller wrote:
Dear list,
I am trying to implement a publish-subscribe mechanism in for an
embedded
R interpreter. But somehow my registered closures seem to get collected
by
the GC, even though I have protected them. I have reducted my code to
the
ction (f) { .Call(\"set_callback1\",f); }");
r_exec("y <- function (f) { .Call(\"set_callback2\",f); }");
r_exec("x(function() { print(\"A\"); })");
r_exec("y(function() { print(\"B\"); })");
for
On Thu, 15 May 2008 06:04:51 -, Prof Brian Ripley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last question: Will I need to UNPROTECT_PTR all references held, or
will the call to Rf_endEmbeddedR also free protected references?
What is a 'reference' here?
Right, my question was imprecise. I meant 'SEXP
On Thu, 15 May 2008 07:15:15 +0200, Prof Brian Ripley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I would like to know, and I have not yet found an answer in the
documentation: is there a way to 'reset' the interpreter to bring it to
the state that it was directly after the call of the initialization
r
Dear List,
I am learning how to use the R.dll unter Windows to embed an R interpreter
into another programming language.
What I would like to know, and I have not yet found an answer in the
documentation: is there a way to 'reset' the interpreter to bring it to
the state that it was direc
