Re: [Rd] R-forge, package dependencies

I have exactly the same issue with a pair of my packages on R-Forge. I've already notified Stefan, but I mentioned it wasn't urgent for me :) It must have something to do with the R check using a different environment than the build... So good hunting, Stefan! Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa

[Rd] Dependencies on recommended packages

will gladly stand corrected. I'll leave it to you gurus to judge. Thanks for R! (And another shout out to Stefan, who diligently helped me) Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http://biomath.ugent.be/ http://biomath.ugent.be wink: A1.056, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent ring: 09

[Rd] plot(.xy) and add

consequences in some cases (e.g. xlim and ylim should be ignored in these cases), but I cannot imagine these truly to be worse than not supporting it. Is there (still) a reason why this not supported and/or do people find this as troublesome as I do? Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa

Re: [Rd] NOTE: unstated dependencies in examples

without regard). A second point is that the package would not *depend* or anything on R= 2.14.0. But it depends on it: it won't pass the checks for R 2.14.0. Somewhat silly if it only depends on it because of the check, no? Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http

Re: [Rd] R CMD check file issues

way to provide you the sessionInfo of the session that is started by R CMD check (Assuming that at that point, an 'actual' R session has actually been started - it appears the error occurs before any 'real work' is started). Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http://biomath.ugent.be

Re: [Rd] R CMD check file issues

place I know of where R has problems with the slow filehandling in Win7, a solution may be to check repeatedly (with some delay and a timeout) after the delete calls whether the files are actually gone. Ugly, I admit, but since our Redmond friends don't provide it... Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa

[Rd] R check error / update.packages

to define exactly which packages should or shouldn't be updated, but it would be nice if the update.packages at least issued a warning against this. Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http://biomath.ugent.be/ http://biomath.ugent.be wink: A1.056, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent

[Rd] R CMD check file issues

processes file handling (there are known issues even noticeable in windows explorer), but perhaps there is a way of circumventing this? It would be greatly appreciated, as this issue is preventing automation of build/check/install scripts. Suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Nick Sabbe

Re: [Rd] R CMD check file issues

(apart from the obvious suggestion to install Linux), as it is immensely annoying... Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http://biomath.ugent.be wink: A1.056, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent ring: 09/264.59.36 -- Do Not Disapprove -Original Message- From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:lig

Re: [Rd] R CMD check file issues

, the folder is truly gone, and the R CMD check can safely do its work. Is anyone else here using Win7 (32bit) and successfully building/checking R packages? Perhaps I'm the only one who has treaded this path :-) Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http://biomath.ugent.be wink: A1.056

[Rd] do.call and sys.call: suggestion for improval?

completely misunderstood how things work, I will gladly accept redirections and/or flames. Thanks in advance (well, not for potential flames), Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http://biomath.ugent.be wink: A1.056, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent ring: 09/264.59.36 -- Do Not Disapprove

[Rd] Linking to lapack

for any input. Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http://biomath.ugent.be wink: A1.056, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent ring: 09/264.59.36 -- Do Not Disapprove __ R-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel