Re: [Rd] R-forge, package dependencies

I have exactly the same issue with a pair of my packages on R-Forge. I've already notified Stefan, but I mentioned it wasn't urgent for me :) It must have something to do with the R check using a different environment than the build... So good hunting, Stefan! Nick Sabbe -- pin

[Rd] Dependencies on recommended packages

may run into this sooner or later. If not or if my/our analysis is wrong/incomplete I will gladly stand corrected. I'll leave it to you gurus to judge. Thanks for R! (And another shout out to Stefan, who diligently helped me) Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: <http:

[Rd] plot(.xy) and add

have some unexpected consequences in some cases (e.g. xlim and ylim should be ignored in these cases), but I cannot imagine these truly to be worse than not supporting it. Is there (still) a reason why this not supported and/or do people find this as troublesome as I do? Nick Sabbe -- pin

Re: [Rd] NOTE: unstated dependencies in examples

version, yet this scenario is not that strange that it should be ditched without regard). > > > > A second point is that the package would not *depend* or anything on > R>= > > 2.14.0. > > But it depends on it: it won't pass the checks for R < 2.14.0. Som

Re: [Rd] R CMD check file issues

s the only place I know of where R has problems with the slow filehandling in Win7, a solution may be to check repeatedly (with some delay and a timeout) after the delete calls whether the files are actually gone. Ugly, I admit, but since our Redmond friends don't provide it... Nick Sabbe -

Re: [Rd] R CMD check file issues

vious way to provide you the sessionInfo of the session that is started by R CMD check (Assuming that at that point, an 'actual' R session has actually been started - it appears the error occurs before any 'real work' is started). Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link

Re: [Rd] R CMD check file issues

, the folder is truly gone, and the R CMD check can safely do its work. Is anyone else here using Win7 (32bit) and successfully building/checking R packages? Perhaps I'm the only one who has treaded this path :-) Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http://biomath.ugent.be wi

Re: [Rd] R CMD check file issues

(apart from the obvious suggestion to install Linux), as it is immensely annoying... Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http://biomath.ugent.be wink: A1.056, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent ring: 09/264.59.36 -- Do Not Disapprove > -Original Message- > From: U

[Rd] R CMD check file issues

hout the error. I think this has something to do with how Win7 processes file handling (there are known issues even noticeable in windows explorer), but perhaps there is a way of circumventing this? It would be greatly appreciated, as this issue is preventing automation of build/check/install scrip

[Rd] R check error / update.packages

through the same troubles and pointed me to the solution. I can imagine it to be hard to define exactly which packages should or shouldn't be updated, but it would be nice if the update.packages at least issued a warning against this. Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: <

[Rd] do.call and sys.call: suggestion for improval?

x27;s not so easy to code that"), I would be very interested in learning about it. Also, if I have completely misunderstood how things work, I will gladly accept redirections and/or flames. Thanks in advance (well, not for potential flames), Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link

[Rd] Linking to lapack

iles? If it does not exist already, I would surely be willing to work on it. Thanks for any input. Nick Sabbe -- ping: nick.sa...@ugent.be link: http://biomath.ugent.be wink: A1.056, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent ring: 09/264.59.36 -- Do Not Disapprove __