Hi maintainers,
When I try to download the tarball of the daily snapshot from
https://stat.ethz.ch/R/daily, I get a
'403 Forbidden'
'You don't have permission to access this resource'.
It seems that the permissions were accidentally tightened?
Greetings,
Rainer Hurling
Hi Martin,
Am 16.04.2018 um 09:03 schrieb Martin Maechler:
Rainer Hurling <rhur...@gwdg.de>
on Sun, 15 Apr 2018 11:01:59 +0200 writes:
> Out of curiosity, I played a bit with the new function
> packageDate() from April, 4th. All works fine, except
> using
t; is missing, with no default
*** caught segfault ***
address 0x77bc3c0, cause 'memory not mapped'
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
My system is FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT amd64 with R-devel (r74601).
Regards,
Rainer Hurling
__
R-devel@r-project.org maili
Am 09.02.2017 um 13:14 schrieb Prof Brian Ripley:
> On 09/02/2017 11:44, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>> Dear R devs,
>>
>> For some days now (~ February, 4th), I am not able to build the recent
>> tarballs of R-devel on a FreeBSD test box anymore. The breakage seems to
can give me a hint, want to do next?
Please let me know, if I should provide more information or can test
something.
Many thanks in advance,
Rainer Hurling
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Am 05.09.2015 um 19:09 schrieb peter dalgaard:
>
>> On 05 Sep 2015, at 13:54 , Rainer Hurling <rhur...@gwdg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Am 05.09.2015 um 10:18 schrieb peter dalgaard:
>>>
>>>> On 05 Sep 2015, at 08:28 , Rainer Hurling <rhur...@gwdg.de>
would be appreciated.
Thanks and greetings,
Rainer Hurling
[1] https://stat.ethz.ch/R/daily/R-devel.tar.gz
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Am 05.09.2015 um 10:18 schrieb peter dalgaard:
>
>> On 05 Sep 2015, at 08:28 , Rainer Hurling <rhur...@gwdg.de> wrote:
>>
>> Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202?
>>
>> It seems, that newer R-devel versions are now published o
missed something.
Best wishes,
Rainer Hurling
Martin
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Am 19.07.2015 um 10:19 schrieb peter dalgaard:
An updated tarball should be available in $CRAN/src/base/pre-release soon.
(For CRAN=https://cran.r-project.org, immediately. Other mirrors need
mirroring.)
Wow, that's fast! Many thanks for the update.
Greetings,
Rainer Hurling
-pd
hint, and also to Detlef for taking it.
Greetings,
Rainer Hurling
Best,
Uwe Ligges
On 16.02.2015 09:29, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Dear developers,
I found a small typo in the german translation for the aggregate()
function:
In the string keine Zeile für die Aggragation it should
.
Best regards,
Rainer Hurling
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
For some days now there had been no more daily snapshots on
ftp://ftp.stat.math.ethz.ch/Software/R/ .
The latest sources are from 07/26/2012. I think this is not indented?
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
On 18.05.2012 16:15 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 15/05/2012 20:45, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 15.05.2012 20:49 (UTC+1), Murray Stokely wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Rainer Hurlingrhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
About April 25th, there had been some changes within R-devel's
src/nmath
bits in the configure script,
src/include/Rmath.h0.in, and src/nmath/log1p.c; thanks to b.f. for
pointing me out to this).
Thanks for any help,
Rainer Hurling
CC'ed to b.f. as the maintainer of the math/R port on FreeBSD.
__
R-devel@r-project.org
On 15.05.2012 20:49 (UTC+1), Murray Stokely wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Rainer Hurlingrhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
About April 25th, there had been some changes within R-devel's
src/nmath/pnbeta.c (and probably some other relevant places) and now
building R-devel on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT
Am 11.01.2012 11:58 (UTC+1) schrieb Rainer Hurling:
On 11.01.2012 11:32 (UTC+1), Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 11.01.2012 11:13, Rainer Hurling wrote:
With newest R devel
#sessionInfo()
R Under development (unstable) (2012-01-10 r58085)
Platform: amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0 (64-bit)
locale:
[1
' cannot be changed
Error: loading failed
Execution halted
ERROR: loading failed
* removing '/usr/local/lib/R/library/lubridate'
* restoring previous '/usr/local/lib/R/library/lubridate'
Do you have any idea what is going on here?
Thanks in advance,
Rainer Hurling
On 11.01.2012 11:32 (UTC+1), Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 11.01.2012 11:13, Rainer Hurling wrote:
With newest R devel
#sessionInfo()
R Under development (unstable) (2012-01-10 r58085)
Platform: amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0 (64-bit)
locale:
[1]
de_DE.ISO8859-15/de_DE.ISO8859-15/de_DE.ISO8859-15/C
BUT:
Today I tried again with newest version r56478 and surprisingly, all
that problems disappeared. Even no more warnings at build time.
For sureness I checked again older versions (between 15.07. and 21.07)
but the build warnings there exist, with version r56478 they went away.
Rainer Hurling
P.S
be re-installed
Googling around for some days now it looks like this does not happen to
anyone else (at least there are no infos). Does anybody knows what is
going on here?
Any help would be appreciated,
Rainer Hurling
sessionInfo()
R Under development (unstable) (2011-07-21 r56467)
Platform
to change 'pythag' against
'hypot' in spatstat/src/lookup.c and it works. Is this the only required
adaption which has to be done on the four named packages?
Thanks in advance,
Rainer Hurling
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch
On 19.03.2011 15:52 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Today I installed the newest R develepment branch
R version 2.14.0 Under development (unstable) (2011-03-18 r54866)
on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT (amd64). All seems fine so far.
But that is very raw
On 07.02.2011 23:45 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
A follow-up on this.
Cygwin has recently[*] added support for C99 complex math, taken from
NetBSD with code that is very similar to that from Steven Moshier
available via http://www.moshier.net/c9x_readme.html.
That code isn't entirely
On 08.02.2011 22:10 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 07.02.2011 23:45 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
A follow-up on this.
Cygwin has recently[*] added support for C99 complex math, taken from
NetBSD with code that is very similar to that from
exactly characterizes a C99 compiler? Does gcc-4.5.2 belongs to
this? Are the special arguments or knobs to consider? Any other ideas?
Please let me know if more infos are needed.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Rainer Hurling
__
R-devel@r-project.org
On 06.02.2011 16:22 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Today I tried two build R-devel_2011-02-06.tar.gz from sources on
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT (amd64) with gcc-4.5.2 and I got the following
messages when configuring:
./configure
[..SNIP..]
checking
On 06.02.2011 18:24 (UTC+1), Murray Stokely wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Rainer Hurlingrhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
I think this is really a FreeBSD support question. In 2011, an OS really
should have support for a 1999 standard. Darwin, a FreeBSD derivative,
does and its help page says
On 06.02.2011 18:24 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 06.02.2011 16:22 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Today I tried two build R-devel_2011-02-06.tar.gz from sources on
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT (amd64
On 28.10.2010 20:07 (UTC+1), Michael Lawrence wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de
mailto:rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
On 27.10.2010 15:07 (UTC+1), Michael Lawrence wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de
On 27.10.2010 15:07 (UTC+1), Michael Lawrence wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de
mailto:rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
On 22.10.2010 22:10 (UTC+1), Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 22.10.2010 16:18 (UTC+2), Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 22.10.2010 14:57
On 22.10.2010 22:10 (UTC+1), Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 22.10.2010 16:18 (UTC+2), Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 22.10.2010 14:57 (UTC+1), Michael Lawrence wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de
mailto:rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
[moved from R-help]
On 21.10.2010 18:09
On 22.10.2010 14:57 (UTC+1), Michael Lawrence wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de
mailto:rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
[moved from R-help]
On 21.10.2010 18:09 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
If you do R CMD INSTALL --no-test-load this will skip
On 22.10.2010 16:18 (UTC+2), Rainer Hurling wrote:
On 22.10.2010 14:57 (UTC+1), Michael Lawrence wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Rainer Hurling rhur...@gwdg.de
mailto:rhur...@gwdg.de wrote:
[moved from R-help]
On 21.10.2010 18:09 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
If you do R CMD
-devel?
I moved to R-devel.
And can you check the RGtk2 version? A recent but not current version
(2.12.17?) did hang initializing Gtk+ on some platforms and Michael
Lawrence had to be involved.
I am using RGtk2_2.12.18.tar.gz for month now.
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Am
.
-
Is this a known error? I would really appreciate if someone could give
me a hint.
Please let me know if more information is needed.
Thanks in advance,
Rainer Hurling
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
On 03.10.2010 17:10 (UTC+1), Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Rainer Hurling wrote:
I tried to compile R-beta_2010-10-02_r53128 on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT
(amd64) with gcc-4.4.5 and it fails:
-
gcc -std=gnu99 -I../../src/extra/zlib -I../../src
On 03.10.2010 17:08 (UTC+1), Peter Dalgaard wrote:
On 10/03/2010 04:24 PM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
I tried to compile R-beta_2010-10-02_r53128 on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT
(amd64) with gcc-4.4.5 and it fails:
Thanks for the report. WIFEXITED/WEXITSTATUS are usually defined in
sys/wait.h (usually
On 03.10.2010 18:38 (UTC+1), Peter Dalgaard wrote:
On 10/03/2010 05:58 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Rainer Hurling wrote:
...
Is this a known error? I would really appreciate if someone could give
me a hint.
Not known, and as it is a POSIX construction almost all OSes
On 19.03.2009 10:37 (UTC+1), Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote:
Rainer Hurling wrote:
On a recent FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) building R (any version)
breaks with the following messages:
[...]
I run 7.1-RELEASE (amd64) so I cannot comment on any potential issues
with 8.0-CURRENT. On my machine the r
Todays (03/20/2009) update of FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT solved the problem.
The two pathes are resolving again. So building and installing R on
CURRENT works again :-)
Thanks for your patience,
Rainer
On 17.03.2009 16:11 (UTC+1), Rainer Hurling wrote:
On a recent FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386
within latest FreeBSD code (?) and I have
to ask on the FreeBSD mailing list. But before I wanted to ask on
r-de...@. Perhaps someone here has an idea? Any hints are very welcome.
Thanks in advance,
Rainer Hurling
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
Trying out some encodings and locales I just found a small typo in an
error message of R 2.9.0 (2009-02-06 r47865).
In 'po/de.po' at line 5100 it has to be spelled 'Lokalisierung' instead
of 'Lokilisierung'.
Rainer
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing
Just some feedback for the record.
Since version R-devel_2009-01-20.tar.gz with Matrix_0.999375-18.tar.gz
included I am able again to compile and install R on FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT
out of the box.
Many thanks to Martin Maechler and Brian Ripley for the help and work,
Rainer Hurling
Am
Studio compilers say some of the C++ code is invalid
(and it looks so to me, and I reported it a while back): the file is
spqr_front.cpp, so it has not got as far as the point that is giving you
trouble.
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Dear developers,
today I tried to build
Matrix package on R-devel? For all other packages there is no
need to do so (at least for FreeBSD ;-)
Please let me know if I can help.
Thanks in advance,
Rainer Hurling
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
.
This happens with all recent beta versions. R version 2.7.1 Patched
(2008-08-10 r46284) installed and worked fine.
Could this be a bug with R-beta or is there something wrong with my
FreeBSD version?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Rainer Hurling
.
This happens with all recent beta versions. R version 2.7.1 Patched
(2008-08-10 r46284) installed and worked fine.
Could this be a bug with R-beta or is there something wrong with my
FreeBSD version?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Rainer Hurling
, on my wishlist is a general way to
integrate the search for gmake on systems like FreeBSD in the
configure script of packages like Matrix ... ;-)
Rainer Hurling
Hin-Tak Leung schrieb:
Rainer Hurling wrote:
Thanks, Brian and Martin,
I think you are both right, Matrix tries to use BSD make
FreeBSD I have installed the LAPACK package (3.0.2) with library
at location
/usr/local/lib/liblapack.so.4
Is it possible that the Makefile of package Matrix fails because of that?
Any help is appreciated,
Rainer Hurling
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing
2007, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Trying to compile the package Matrix_0.9975-11.tar.gz with newest
R-2.5.0 alpha (2007-03-31 r40986) on FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT (i386) I get
the following error:
-
R CMD INSTALL Matrix_0.9975-11.tar.gz
* Installing to library '/usr/local/lib/R/library'
* Installing
, let me know.
Andrew
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 10:10:45PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
Thanks, Brian and Martin,
I think you are both right, Matrix tries to use BSD make (/usr/bin/make)
on FreeBSD instead of GNU make (/usr/local/bin/gmake).
Sorry, but I don't know how to persuade
Hallo Duncan,
your newest version works fine under R-2.5.0 (devel) on FreeBSD
7.0-CURRENT (i386). I made some tests with different types of diagrams
and all seems to be ok for me.
Thank you very much. I am look forward to the release of this version.
Have a nice trip,
Rainer
Duncan Murdoch
I tried todays R-devel (2006-11-30) with FreeBSD-7.0 CURRENT and it
seems, that compiling with 'make make install' is ok again.
Thank you very much,
Rainer Hurling
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
As I said to you privately, I believe this to be a make issue: does GNU
make work? We don't
the following:
nm /usr/lib/libc.a | grep cpow
nm /usr/lib/libm.a | grep cpow
In both cases without any result.
Where I have to look? Or what else can I do to find out where the libs
with these procedures are?
Rainer Hurling
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
These were found by AC_CHECK_FUNCS (please confirm
.
Am I missing something?
Thank you,
Rainer Hurling
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
56 matches
Mail list logo
