> Hugh Parsonage writes:
> If a function contains the pattern `<-` it is (with a few exceptions)
> deemed to be a replacement function and in particular must have second
> argument `value` to pass R CMD check.
> Consider the function %<->% or any other function containing <- within
> grapes.
If a function contains the pattern `<-` it is (with a few exceptions)
deemed to be a replacement function and in particular must have second
argument `value` to pass R CMD check.
Consider the function %<->% or any other function containing <- within
grapes. I claim that such functions should not
