Dear list,
I got an automatic email complaining than some of my packages didn't
pass 'R CMD check' for R-2.10.0 alpha anymore. Both of them make use of
the "cases" LaTeX environment.
Inspecting the log outputs I got:
LaTeX errors when creating PDF version.
This typically indicate
On 10/10/2009 8:07 AM, Mathieu Ribatet wrote:
Dear list,
I got an automatic email complaining than some of my packages didn't
pass 'R CMD check' for R-2.10.0 alpha anymore. Both of them make use of
the "cases" LaTeX environment.
Inspecting the log outputs I got:
LaTeX errors when creat
On 10/10/2009 8:07 AM, Mathieu Ribatet wrote:
Dear list,
I got an automatic email complaining than some of my packages didn't
pass 'R CMD check' for R-2.10.0 alpha anymore. Both of them make use of
the "cases" LaTeX environment.
Inspecting the log outputs I got:
LaTeX errors when creat
On 10/10/2009 2:25 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 10/10/2009 8:07 AM, Mathieu Ribatet wrote:
Dear list,
I got an automatic email complaining than some of my packages didn't
pass 'R CMD check' for R-2.10.0 alpha anymore. Both of them make use of
the "cases" LaTeX environment.
Inspecting the log o
Thanks Duncan for all these answers. Indeed I should have checked that
the "cases" environment was provided by Rd.sty. Mea culpa.
The good point is that before 2.10.0 alpha "R CMD check" finished
without any error but the output was wrong - because of the cases
environment as you said. Now it fail
Mathieu Ribatet wrote:
Thanks Duncan for all these answers. Indeed I should have checked that
the "cases" environment was provided by Rd.sty. Mea culpa.
The good point is that before 2.10.0 alpha "R CMD check" finished
without any error but the output was wrong - because of the cases
environment
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Mathieu Ribatet wrote:
Thanks Duncan for all these answers. Indeed I should have checked that
the "cases" environment was provided by Rd.sty. Mea culpa.
The good point is that before 2.10.0 alpha "R CMD check" finished
without any error but the output was wrong - because of
