Hi Simon,
I have been busy with work, but I finally got around to repackaging
libiconv for AIX - in a way that both adds GNU libiconv support
(libiconv.so.2 member) and is both 32 and 64 bit without breaking
support for IBM iconv applications.
I concur that iconv is a pain as IBM and GNU
On 04-Jan-16 15:52, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Jan 4, 2016, at 1:34 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
I would be "pleased" if you would try packages - i.e., none of "Toolbox" or
Perzl rpm's.
R requires iconv, so you have to get that somehow. I tried to bypass the check
and build
The bulk is on my forums - the final post for today is:
Results to date:
A. It looks like I am going to need a newer compiler for C - xlc/xlC V11
apparently does not understand this code:
"/data/prj/cran/R-3.2.3/src/main/memory.c", line 2149.31: 1506-046 (S)
Syntax error.
I will have to
On Jan 4, 2016, at 1:34 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
> I would be "pleased" if you would try packages - i.e., none of "Toolbox" or
> Perzl rpm's.
>
R requires iconv, so you have to get that somehow. I tried to bypass the check
and build it anyway against the system one, but
Michael,
I'm using xlc + xlf - the exact flags are
configure CC=xlc_r CXX=xlc++_r F77=xlf_r FC=xlf95_r LIBS='-L/opt/freeware/lib
/opt/freeware/lib/libiconv.a -lpthread' --prefix=/opt/freeware
CPPFLAGS=-I/opt/freeware/include
with export OBJECT_MODE=64 in the env (and libiconv from perzl.org
I would be "pleased" if you would try packages - i.e., none of "Toolbox"
or Perzl rpm's.
The iconv I supply might not be working as is (I will need to install a
new system to check). However, this is why I have been testing with
R-3.2.3 - to side-step the system library dependencies.
re: xz
On 2016-01-01 23:48, peter dalgaard wrote:
Nice catch you two!!!
Happy New Year
-pd
I am much happier with this great start!
Simon - which compiler)s) did you use: xlc and xlfortran, or gcc/gfortran?
I have made some changes to configure(.ac) so maybe my problems are
self-inflicted. But
On 2016-01-03 16:59, Michael Felt wrote:
On 2016-01-01 23:48, peter dalgaard wrote:
Nice catch you two!!!
Happy New Year
-pd
I am much happier with this great start!
Simon - which compiler)s) did you use: xlc and xlfortran, or
gcc/gfortran?
I have made some changes to configure(.ac) so
On 2016-01-03 17:28, Michael Felt wrote:
On 2016-01-03 16:59, Michael Felt wrote:
On 2016-01-01 23:48, peter dalgaard wrote:
Nice catch you two!!!
Happy New Year
-pd
I am much happier with this great start!
Simon - which compiler)s) did you use: xlc and xlfortran, or
gcc/gfortran?
I have
Nice catch you two!!!
Happy New Year
-pd
> On 01 Jan 2016, at 22:06 , Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> Ok, found the problem - on platforms that support it TRE uses wint_t (from
> wchar.h) as its type for characters (tre_cint_t) which on AIX is *signed*
> int. TRE uses
Ok, found the problem - on platforms that support it TRE uses wint_t (from
wchar.h) as its type for characters (tre_cint_t) which on AIX is *signed* int.
TRE uses liberally conversions between int and tre_cint_t apparently assuming
that the latter is unsigned so conversions back to int are
Michael,
thanks, I'll have a look once my PDP VMs are up again (later today). This may
be a signedness issue although it's unclear why other platforms wouldn't be
affected.
Cheers,
Simon
On Dec 31, 2015, at 10:14 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
> On 2015-12-30 09:58, Michael
On 2015-12-30 09:58, Michael Felt wrote:
On 2015-12-29 11:02, Michael Felt wrote:
This seems to be a problem that goes back a long time - and I hope
someone who understands what tre is suppossed to be doing will look
at this.
A short history of other people who have reported on this on
On 2015-12-31 16:14, Michael Felt wrote:
- literal (&, M-^?) (38, 65535), pos 0, sub -1, 0 tags
+ literal (&, M-^?) (38, -1), pos 0, sub -1, 0 tags
Getting down to these two lines - so I think it is now "before"
root@x069:[/data/prj/cran/32/R-aix-3.2.3/src/library/tools]od
On 2015-12-31 17:02, Michael Felt wrote:
On 2015-12-31 16:14, Michael Felt wrote:
- literal (&, M-^?) (38, 65535), pos 0, sub -1, 0 tags
+ literal (&, M-^?) (38, -1), pos 0, sub -1, 0 tags
Getting down to these two lines - so I think it is now "before"
Made a few changes - mainly in
On 2015-12-29 11:02, Michael Felt wrote:
This seems to be a problem that goes back a long time - and I hope
someone who understands what tre is suppossed to be doing will look at
this.
A short history of other people who have reported on this on different
versions of AIX. I shall only add
16 matches
Mail list logo