Re: [Rd] barplot manpage (PR#7331)

2004-11-01 Thread Dan Bolser
Should these be in the (see also section)? Like I said, the pages read fine if you understand the content already. I think some less formal man pages would drastically reduce the traffic on the R mailing list. Just a hunch, Dan. On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Tony Plate wrote: >Look at the help page for

Re: [Rd] barplot manpage (PR#7331)

2004-11-01 Thread Tony Plate
Look at the help page for "par" for explanations of "cex" and "lty". The use of 'mp' is as a variable, as in > mp <- barplot() The next paragraph refers to this variable. -- Tony Plate At Monday 05:12 PM 11/1/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Dan B Version: R 2.0.0 (2004-10-04). OS: Fed

[Rd] barplot manpage (PR#7331)

2004-11-01 Thread dan
Full_Name: Dan B Version: R 2.0.0 (2004-10-04). OS: Fedora 2 Submission from: (NULL) (80.6.127.185) The man page for barplot (?barplot) is confusing... cex.axis: expansion factor for numeric axis labels. cex.names: expansion factor for axis names (bar labels). What is an 'expansion factor', a

Re: [Rd] ks.test calculations incorrect (PR#7330)

2004-11-01 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Full_Name: t. avery > Version: 2.0.0 > OS: windows xp / Linux > Submission from: (NULL) (131.162.134.159) > > > ks.test does not produce the correct output. > If given the script: > > d1 <- > c(53.63984674,0.383141762,1.915708812,0.383141762,10.72796935,6.896551724

[Rd] ks.test calculations incorrect (PR#7330)

2004-11-01 Thread tavery
Full_Name: t. avery Version: 2.0.0 OS: windows xp / Linux Submission from: (NULL) (131.162.134.159) ks.test does not produce the correct output. If given the script: d1 <- c(53.63984674,0.383141762,1.915708812,0.383141762,10.72796935,6.896551724,20.30651341,5.747126437,0) d1 d2 <- c(76.433121

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.0/lib/R/bin/INSTALL (PR#7329)

2004-11-01 Thread Uwe Ligges
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote: Dear all, I tried to follow http://www.bioconductor.org/faq.html#getBioC to install it, and that's why I got to the problem. Using getBioC to obtain Bioconductor packages 1. From your R session, type: source("http://www.bioconductor.org/getBioC.R";) [SNIP]

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.0/lib/R/bin/INSTALL (PR#7329)

2004-11-01 Thread James W. MacDonald
Martin MOKREJŠ wrote: Dear all, I tried to follow http://www.bioconductor.org/faq.html#getBioC to install it, and that's why I got to the problem. You got into a problem because you missed the part where it explains that R-2.0.0 currently requires you to install the development versions of Bioc

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.0/lib/R/bin/INSTALL (PR#7329)

2004-11-01 Thread Martin MOKREJŠ
Dear all, I tried to follow http://www.bioconductor.org/faq.html#getBioC to install it, and that's why I got to the problem. Using getBioC to obtain Bioconductor packages 1. From your R session, type: source("http://www.bioconductor.org/getBioC.R";) this will download

Re: [Rd] (PR#7326)(inappropriate) manipulation of expression objects

2004-11-01 Thread ripley
On 29 Oct 2004, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > foo <- expression(alpha, beta, gamma) > > > foo[2] > > expression(beta) > > > foo[2] <- NA > > > foo ## or str(foo) > > Segmentation fault > > > > (Same behaviour in R 1.9.1) > > > > 'foo[[2]] <- NA' works fine, though.

Re: [Rd] (PR#7326)(inappropriate) manipulation of expression objects causes segfault (PR#7326)

2004-11-01 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 29 Oct 2004, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > foo <- expression(alpha, beta, gamma) > > > foo[2] > > expression(beta) > > > foo[2] <- NA > > > foo ## or str(foo) > > Segmentation fault > > > > (Same behaviour in R 1.9.1) > > > > 'foo[[2]] <- NA' works fine, though.

Re: [Rd] Destructive str(...)?

2004-11-01 Thread Luke Tierney
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > Just to be 100% clear, the finalizer is called *at most* once if (as in > tcltk) R_RegisterCFinalizer is called. If you want it to be called > exactly once, you need to use R_RegisterCFinalizerEx. > > The issue is that there may not be a final gc()

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.0/lib/R/bin/INSTALL (PR#7329)

2004-11-01 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > the install script should make sure user has set R_HOME variable. If you mean, R_HOME/bin/INSTALL, that is not an `install script'. It is documented to be run as R CMD INSTALL, and R (a shell script) sets R_HOME. Please see, e.g. `An Introduction

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.0/lib/R/bin/INSTALL (PR#7329)

2004-11-01 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi, > the install script should make sure user has set R_HOME variable. > I don't have it as root, and get stupid messages. Anyway, should it be set > to $blah/R-2.0.0/lib/R/ or $blah/R-2.0.0 ? > Thanks for help > Martin Please read the R-admin manual. The correct wa

[Rd] R-2.0.0/lib/R/bin/INSTALL (PR#7329)

2004-11-01 Thread mmokrejs
Hi, the install script should make sure user has set R_HOME variable. I don't have it as root, and get stupid messages. Anyway, should it be set to $blah/R-2.0.0/lib/R/ or $blah/R-2.0.0 ? Thanks for help Martin __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https:/