Re: [R] F# vs. R

2010-07-11 Thread Sharpie
Sergey Goriatchev wrote: > > Hello, Marc > > No, I do not want to validate Cox PH. :-) > I do use R daily, though right now I do not use the statistical part that > much. > > I just generally wonder if any R-user tried F# and his/her opinions. > > Regards, > Sergey > In my work as a program

Re: [R] F# vs. R

2010-07-11 Thread Steven Lembark
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:34:05 -0300 Bernardo Rangel Tura wrote: > F# is public, but is not open source. > > F# run in windows but run in AIX, linux, MAC, UNIX etc? > > Compiled code should run faster than R, but is precise? > > Compiled code should run faster than R, but is reliable? > > Comp

Re: [R] F# vs. R

2010-07-08 Thread Steve Lianoglou
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Patrick Burns wrote: > I'd like to hear answers to this as well. > A language doesn't have to be a complete > replacement to be useful. Totally agree. > F# seems to have some nice features. My intention isn't to have this explode into a language war, so apologies

Re: [R] F# vs. R

2010-07-08 Thread Ed Keith
Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com --- On Thu, 7/8/10, rkevinbur...@charter.net wrote: > From: rkevinbur...@charter.net > Subject: Re: [R] F# vs. R > To: r-help@r-project.org, "Patrick Burns" , > serg...@gmail.com > Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 10:16 AM > True, porting old C and Fortran c

Re: [R] F# vs. R

2010-07-08 Thread rkevinburton
True, porting old C and Fortran code to C# or F# would be a pain and probably riddled with errors but it is not too soon to start looking to see if there is a better way. There have been numerous ports of LAPACK, BLAS, etc. to C#. Maybe they could be leveraged. Maybe just allowing packages to b

Re: [R] F# vs. R

2010-07-08 Thread Patrick Burns
I'd like to hear answers to this as well. A language doesn't have to be a complete replacement to be useful. F# seems to have some nice features. Pat On 07/07/2010 17:54, Sergey Goriatchev wrote: Hello, Marc No, I do not want to validate Cox PH. :-) I do use R daily, though right now I do not

Re: [R] F# vs. R

2010-07-07 Thread Bernardo Rangel Tura
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 17:31 +0200, Sergey Goriatchev wrote: > Hello, everyone > > F# is now public. Compiled code should run faster than R. > > Anyone has opinion on F# vs. R? Just curious > > Best, > S Sergey, F# is public, but is not open source. F# run in windows but run in AIX, linux, M

Re: [R] F# vs. R

2010-07-07 Thread Sergey Goriatchev
Hello, Marc No, I do not want to validate Cox PH. :-) I do use R daily, though right now I do not use the statistical part that much. I just generally wonder if any R-user tried F# and his/her opinions. Regards, Sergey On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 17:56, Marc Schwartz wrote: > On Jul 7, 2010, at 10

Re: [R] F# vs. R

2010-07-07 Thread Marc Schwartz
On Jul 7, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Sergey Goriatchev wrote: > Hello, everyone > > F# is now public. Compiled code should run faster than R. > > Anyone has opinion on F# vs. R? Just curious > > Best, > S The key time critical parts of R are written in compiled C and FORTRAN. Of course, if you want

[R] F# vs. R

2010-07-07 Thread Sergey Goriatchev
Hello, everyone F# is now public. Compiled code should run  faster than R. Anyone has opinion on F# vs. R? Just curious Best, S -- --- Kniven skärpes bara mot stenen. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-he