Dirty solution: switched off x-axis plotting via 'par' and added it the
personalized way with 'axis'.
Joh
Johannes Graumann wrote:
> Hm, now I have trouble using additional "vioplot" parameters.
>
> mu<-2
> si<-0.6
> bimodal<-c(rnorm(1000,-mu,si),rnorm(1000,mu,si))
> uniform<-runif(2000,-4,4)
>
Hm, now I have trouble using additional "vioplot" parameters.
mu<-2
si<-0.6
bimodal<-c(rnorm(1000,-mu,si),rnorm(1000,mu,si))
uniform<-runif(2000,-4,4)
normal<-rnorm(2000,0,3)
mylist <- list(bimodal,uniform,normal)
# Easy
do.call(vioplot,mylist)
# Works
do.call(vioplot,c(mylist,col="white"))
# Does
Off-list it was pointed out to me that the trivial solution to this would
look like this:
myfunction2 <- function(x, ...){
mylist <- list(x, ...)
# plenty of "lapply" stuff
do.call(vioplot,mylist)
}
Thanks for everybodies patience,
Joh
Johannes Graumann wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the very
Thanks for the very appropriate scolding.
Here's my example (based on "?vioplot"):
mu<-2
si<-0.6
bimodal<-c(rnorm(1000,-mu,si),rnorm(1000,mu,si))
uniform<-runif(2000,-4,4)
normal<-rnorm(2000,0,3)
# Working just fine
myfunction1 <- function(x, ...){vioplot(x,...)}
myfunction1(bimodal,uniform,norm
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented,
minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
It is hard to provide a solution if we do not understand the problem
to be solved. Sample data would be helpful along with an
understanding of what you w
Johannes Graumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a list of vectors and am trying to coerce them into something that
> vioplot will take as groups of data to be plotted independently. Can
> someone nudge me into the right direction?
>
> Thanks, Joh
>
> __
> R
Hi,
I have a list of vectors and am trying to coerce them into something that
vioplot will take as groups of data to be plotted independently. Can
someone nudge me into the right direction?
Thanks, Joh
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.
7 matches
Mail list logo