Hi Boris,
yes I tried this way and it worked. The fact is that I wanted to be
compliant with the old code, I did not want to change anything. So I wanted
to find a new way to rewrite the code.
Thanks
~ Francesco Brundu
On 19 April 2014 23:18, Boris Steipe boris.ste...@utoronto.ca wrote:
Have
Thanks Boris for the detailed answer. I thought to make it backward
compatible because I did not know if gamma parameter would change the
result if absent. As far as I can see changes in my results are not
relevant, so I think to follow your advice to update the old code.
Thanks
~ Francesco
Hi all,
I am using an old code (probably written for R 2.5) and it stops when
calling rainbow() with gamma argument. I saw that gamma argument is not
present in newer version of R rainbow function. How can I translate this
line of code:
rainbow(100, s = 1.0, v = 0.75, start = 0.0, end = 0.75,
Have you looked at ?rainbow ?
Is there a reason why you don't simply leave the gamma parameter away?
Try:
pie(rep(1,100), col=rainbow(100, s = 1.0, v = 0.75, start = 0.0, end = 0.75))
Cheers,
B.
On 2014-04-19, at 6:05 AM, Francesco Brundu wrote:
Hi all,
I am using an old code (probably
If it MUST be parameter-compatible with the old call, you could just add ...
to your local version of rainbow. The unused parameter will then be dropped.
Here's how:
# The original creates an error ...
rainbow(100, s = 1.0, v = 0.75, start = 0.0, end = 0.75, gamma = 1.5)
Error in rainbow(100,
5 matches
Mail list logo