2014 03:48
|To: r-h...@stat.math.ethz.ch
|Subject: Re: [R] Lme4 Package Help!
|
|Doran, Harold air.org> writes:
|
|>
|> Daniel
|>
|> Lmer has never returned p-values from a model summary; this is a
|> well-known and discussed issue. You must have post-processed the data
|> in so
Doran, Harold air.org> writes:
>
> Daniel
>
> Lmer has never returned p-values from a model summary;
> this is a well-known and discussed issue. You must
> have post-processed the data in some way to get the p-values.
But it's worth noting that lmerTest does, and the way it works
makes it p
...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Daniel Mello
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 6:24 PM
To: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: [R] Lme4 Package Help!
Hello, all!
So, as stated in the title, the Lme4 package used to output p-values for the
fixed effects. What
Daniel Mello ucmerced.edu> writes:
>
> Hello, all!
>
> So, as stated in the title, the Lme4 package used
> to output p-values for the
> fixed effects. What happened?!
>
> Literally 2 weeks ago, I ran code, got output with no errors, and had
> p-values listed for my fixed effects.
>
> Now, ru
Hello, all!
So, as stated in the title, the Lme4 package used to output p-values for the
fixed effects. What happened?!
Literally 2 weeks ago, I ran code, got output with no errors, and had
p-values listed for my fixed effects.
Now, running THE SAME CODE with THE SAME DATASET (nothing at all ha
5 matches
Mail list logo