Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-18 Thread Marc Roos
Maybe this could be interesting to verify against found anomalies? "A second memory card with uncounted votes was found during an audit in Fayette County, Georgia, containing 2,755 votes"

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-16 Thread Matthew McCormack
Bye the way, I thought I had checked my e-mail before sending it, but my last e-mail had an unfortunate typo with an 'I' that originally belonged to the beginning of a deleted sentence. Matthew On 11/17/20 1:54 AM, Matthew McCormack wrote: External Email - Use Caution No reason to

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-16 Thread Matthew McCormack
No reason to apologize. It's a timely and very interesting topic that provides a glimpse into the application of statistics in forensics. I had never heard of Benford's Law before and I think it is really fascinating. One of those very counter intuitive rules that show up in statistics

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-16 Thread Abby Spurdle
I've come to the conclusion this whole thing was a waste of time. This is after evaluating much of the relevant information. The main problem is a large number of red herrings (some in the data, some in the context), leading pointless data analysis and pointless data collection. It's unlikely

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-15 Thread Matthew McCormack
  I really like this guy's video as well. (He also has another nice video critiquing a statistical analysis of vote results from Kent county, Michigan that was presented by a Massachusetts Senate candidate, who has some impressive academic credentials. )   And continuing in this same vein of

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-15 Thread Abby Spurdle
I've updated the dataset. (Which now includes turnout and population estimates). Also, I've found some anomalous features in the data. (Namely, more "straight lines" than what I would intuitively expect). The dataset/description are on my website. (Links at bottom).

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-14 Thread Rolf Turner
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:02:19 -0800 Jeff Newmiller wrote: > It was explained in the video... his counts were so small that they > spanned the 1-9 and 10-99 ranges. Sorry, missed that. I'll have to watch the video again. Thanks. cheers, Rolf > > On November 13, 2020 6:59:49 PM PST, Rolf

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-13 Thread Jeff Newmiller
It was explained in the video... his counts were so small that they spanned the 1-9 and 10-99 ranges. On November 13, 2020 6:59:49 PM PST, Rolf Turner wrote: > >On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 01:23:06 +0100 >Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote: > >> Please watch this video if you wrongly believe

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-13 Thread Rolf Turner
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 01:23:06 +0100 Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote: > Please watch this video if you wrongly believe that Benford's law > easily can be applied to elections results. > > https://youtu.be/etx0k1nLn78 Just watched this video and found it to be delightfully enlightening

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-11 Thread Martin Møller Skarbiniks Pedersen
Please watch this video if you wrongly believe that Benford's law easily can be applied to elections results. https://youtu.be/etx0k1nLn78 On Sun, Nov 1, 2020, 21:17 Spencer Graves < spencer.gra...@effectivedefense.org> wrote: > Hello: > > >What can you tell me about plans to analyze

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-09 Thread Bert Gunter
For those who are interested: Very nice examples of (static) statistical graphics on election results can be found here: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/09/us/arizona-election-battleground-state-counties.html?action=click=Spotlight=Homepage Takes multidisciplinary teams and lots of

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-09 Thread Abby Spurdle
RESENT INITIAL EMAIL, TOO BIG ATTACHMENTS REPLACED WITH LINKS I created a dataset, linked. Had to manually copy and paste from the NY Times website. > head (data, 3) STATE EQCOUNTY RMARGIN_2016 RMARGIN_2020 NVOTERS_2020 SUB_STATEVAL_2016 1 Alabama Mobile 13.3 12

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-09 Thread Marc Roos
Publish the results/graphs please, like to see what your are doing. -Original Message- From: Matthew McCormack [mailto:mccorm...@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2020 6:14 PM To: r-help@r-project.org Subject: Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-09 Thread Matthew McCormack
Benford Analysis for Data Validation and Forensic Analytics Provides tools that make it easier to validate data using Benford's Law. https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/benford.analysis/versions/0.1.5 Matthew On 11/9/20 9:23 AM, Alexandra Thorn wrote: > External Email - Use

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-09 Thread Alexandra Thorn
This thread strikes me as pretty far off-topic for a forum dedicated to software support on R. https://www.r-project.org/mail.html#instructions "The ‘main’ R mailing list, for discussion about problems and solutions using R, announcements (not covered by ‘R-announce’ or ‘R-packages’, see above),

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-08 Thread Matthew McCormack
You can try here: https://decisiondeskhq.com/ I think they have what you are looking for. From their website: "Create a FREE account to access up to the minute election results and insights on all U.S. Federal elections. Decision Desk HQ & Øptimus provide live election night coverage,

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-08 Thread Bert Gunter
NYT had interactive maps that reported votes by county. So try contacting them. Bert On Sun, Nov 8, 2020, 8:10 PM Abby Spurdle wrote: > > such a repository already exists -- the NY Times, AP, CNN, etc. etc. > already have interactive web pages that did this > > I've been looking for

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-08 Thread Abby Spurdle
> such a repository already exists -- the NY Times, AP, CNN, etc. etc. already > have interactive web pages that did this I've been looking for presidential election results, by ***county***. I've found historic results, including results for 2016. However, I can't find such a dataset, for

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-08 Thread Bert Gunter
Unless I misunderstand, clearly such a repository already exists -- the NY Times, AP, CNN, etc. etc. already have interactive web pages that did this!. It doesn't seem to make any difference to Trump conspiracy theorists and partisans, though. Also, as usual, a web search (on "central repository

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-08 Thread Spencer Graves
On 2020-11-07 23:39, Abby Spurdle wrote: What can you tell me about plans to analyze data from this year's general election, especially to detect possible fraud? I was wondering if there's any R packages with out-of-the-box functions for this sort of thing. Can you please let us know, if

Re: [R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-07 Thread Abby Spurdle
> What can you tell me about plans to analyze data from this year's > general election, especially to detect possible fraud? I was wondering if there's any R packages with out-of-the-box functions for this sort of thing. Can you please let us know, if you find any. > I might be able to help with

[R] analyzing results from Tuesday's US elections

2020-11-01 Thread Spencer Graves
Hello: What can you tell me about plans to analyze data from this year's general election, especially to detect possible fraud? I might be able to help with such an effort. I have NOT done much with election data, but I have developed tools for data analysis, including web