Mike Harwood harwood262 at gmail.com writes:
Is the labeling/naming of levels in the documentation for the
predict.glmmPQL function backwards? The documentation states Level
values increase from outermost to innermost grouping, with level zero
corresponding to the population predictions.
The whole of idea of 'level' in mixed models is confusing to some.
Professor Snijders (who teaches our students) and Professor Bates label
from opposite ends.
But, assuming this is my work in package MASS (Master Harwood: it is
childish, to put it mildly, to fail to give due credit), it
Is the labeling/naming of levels in the documentation for the
predict.glmmPQL function backwards? The documentation states Level
values increase from outermost to innermost grouping, with level zero
corresponding to the population predictions. Taking the sample in
the documentation:
fit -
3 matches
Mail list logo
