Bricks fly fine with sufficient thrust, but you have lff with a mu argument
that never gets used, so the negative log-likelihood is constant and mle()
cannot minimize it.
You need to read up on the definition of (log-) likelihood and write a proper
one for your problem.
-pd
> On 26 Jun 2019,
I am analyzing animal movement pattern using levy flight pattern and want
to fit power function to observed data and estimate exponent using Maximum
Likelihood Estimation.
I am using
lff<-function(mu){1-1/mean(log(x))}
library(stats4)
mle(lff, start = list(mu = 1))
where x is the observed data.
Le 28/03/2016 22:19, heba eldeeb via R-help a écrit :
Dear AllI'm trying to find the maximum likelihood estimator of a certain
distribution using nlm command but I receive an error as:
non-finite value supplied by 'nlm'
can't figure out what is wrong in my function
Any help?
Thank you in
Dear AllI'm trying to find the maximum likelihood estimator of a certain
distribution using nlm command but I receive an error as:
non-finite value supplied by 'nlm'
can't figure out what is wrong in my function
Any help?
Thank you in advance
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Standard error = sqrt(diag(solve(opt$hessian)))
Ravi
From: Alaa Sindi [mailto:alaasi...@icloud.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 3:22 PM
To: Ravi Varadhan
Cc: r-help@r-project.org
Subject: Re: help in maximum likelihood
Thank you very much prof. Ravi,
That was very
Thank you very much prof. Ravi,
That was very helpful. Is there a way to get the t and p value for the
coefficients?
Thanks
Alaa
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 10:05 AM, Ravi Varadhan wrote:
>
> There is nothing wrong with the optimization. It is a warning message.
> However,
There is nothing wrong with the optimization. It is a warning message.
However, this is a good example to show that one should not simply dismiss a
warning before understanding what it means. The MLE parameters are also large,
indicating that there is something funky about the model or the
It's useful to add "print.level=2" inside your call to find that there's
essentially nothing wrong.
Rvmmin doesn't give the msg and numDeriv gives a similar (BUT NOT
EXACTLY THE SAME!) hessian estimate.
It's almost always worthwhile turning on the diagnostic printing when
doing optimization,
Hi all,
what is wrong with this code? I am trying to estimate the model parameters by
maximizing the likelihood function and I am getting this warning
Warning message:
In nlm(fn, p = c(-50, 20), hessian = TRUE) :
NA/Inf replaced by maximum positive value
x <- c(1.6907, 1.7242, 1.7552,
9 matches
Mail list logo