On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Ted Harding
ted.hard...@manchester.ac.uk wrote:
Certainly for Windows users, the suggested change could be
wise, since Windows (for reasons best known to someone who
should have known better) conceals the extension from the
I think the reason for hiding
(Ted Harding) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Certainly for Windows users, the suggested change could be
wise, since Windows (for reasons best known to someone who
should have known better) conceals the extension from the
user, unless the user submits to cruel and unusual
To all those who helped with this problem (Ted, Jon, Marc and Prof. Ripley).
When I submitted the postscript files to the journal, I had given them the
extension .ps even though they were (of course) encapsulated postscript. I
decided to simply rename the files with the .eps extension and
Chris Walker wrote:
To all those who helped with this problem (Ted, Jon, Marc and Prof. Ripley).
When I submitted the postscript files to the journal, I had given them the
extension .ps even though they were (of course) encapsulated postscript. I
decided to simply rename the files with the .eps
On 29-Apr-08 12:09:39, Marc Schwartz wrote:
Chris Walker wrote:
To all those who helped with this problem (Ted, Jon, Marc and
Prof. Ripley).
When I submitted the postscript files to the journal, I had
given them the extension .ps even though they were (of course)
encapsulated postscript. I
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Marc Schwartz wrote:
See comments inline:
Chris Walker wrote:
I am using R 2.4.1 with Windows XP.
First, you are using a version of R that is a year and a half and 6
releases out of date. Version 2.7.0 was just released this past week.
You can download it from your
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26-Apr-08 19:30:35, Chris Walker wrote:
I am using R 2.4.1 with Windows XP.
I use the plot command in a fairly simple script and I use
the right mouse click on the plot and save as a postscript
file. I used the resultant file in a paper which
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008, Marc Schwartz wrote:
See comments inline:
Chris Walker wrote:
I am using R 2.4.1 with Windows XP.
First, you are using a version of R that is a year and a half and 6
releases out of date. Version 2.7.0 was just released this past week.
You
Slightly off-topic, but I have been slightly surprised
in recent years at how much trouble I have with the
graphics people at journals -- I have been asked for
TIFF files when I submit PDF, PostScript instead of
PDF, TIFF instead of PNG ... I can do most of these
things by regenerating the
On 27/04/2008 2:05 PM, Ben Bolker wrote:
Slightly off-topic, but I have been slightly surprised
in recent years at how much trouble I have with the
graphics people at journals -- I have been asked for
TIFF files when I submit PDF, PostScript instead of
PDF, TIFF instead of PNG ... I can
I am using R 2.4.1 with Windows XP.
I use the plot command in a fairly simple script and I use the right mouse
click on the plot and save as a postscript file. I used the resultant file
in a paper which was submitted electronically. However, I get the following
response from the journal:
Your
See comments inline:
Chris Walker wrote:
I am using R 2.4.1 with Windows XP.
First, you are using a version of R that is a year and a half and 6
releases out of date. Version 2.7.0 was just released this past week.
You can download it from your nearest CRAN mirror.
I use the plot command
On 26-Apr-08 19:30:35, Chris Walker wrote:
I am using R 2.4.1 with Windows XP.
I use the plot command in a fairly simple script and I use
the right mouse click on the plot and save as a postscript
file. I used the resultant file in a paper which was submitted
electronically. However, I get
13 matches
Mail list logo
