RC;
U.tau.RC <- (N-1)*(dat.rows-1)*tau.RC; # Chi-squared approximation for H0
according to Margolin & Light 1974, see also Liebetrau 1983
p.tau.RC <- pchisq(U.tau.RC,df=(dat.rows-1)*(dat.cols-1),lower=FALSE);
results <- data.frame(tau.RC, tau.CR, p.tau.RC, p.tau.CR, var.tau.RC,
1
Have I missed or misunderstood something here altogether? Should the
alternative H0 probabilities be estimated by e.g. some sort of
fitting? Any pointers, suggestions or assistance would be greatly
appreciated.
-Antti Arppe
--
=======
n
fact already been in implemented in an available library. So, is
anyone on this list aware of such functions/libraries?
Regards,
-Antti Arppe
======
Antti Arppe - Master of Science (Engineering)
Researcher & doctoral student (
more general RxC tables? This was queried
in 1999, but no response seemed then to be forthcoming.
Thanks and regards,
-Antti Arppe
--
======
Antti Arppe - Master of Science (Engineering)
Researcher & doctoral student (Ling
Nathaniel,
On Mon, 7 May 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 12:02:31 + (GMT)
> From: nathaniel Grey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> However what I really want to know is how well my nueral net is
> doing at classifying my binary output variable. I am new to R and I
> can't figure o
etter prediction results or 2) significantly
different (better or worse) results, so one can/should adjust the
interpretation of the standardized d-value in the code accordingly. In
the former case one should use the one-tailed value, and in the later
case the two-tailed value.
-Antti
on with 'read.table', or might the problem with
latin1-to-utf conversion be somewhere else?
Appreciating any help on this matter,
--
==
Antti Arppe - Master of Science (Engineering)
Researcher & doctoral student (Linguistics)
E-mail: [EM
s in the header, without no
fuss.
Thanks for your advice, and wishing all a good Midsummer,
-Antti Arppe
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
so one can only guess that you have a local or Mac-specific setup
issue.
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
If so, you need to
