On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, David Forrest wrote:
...
http://fawn.unibw-hamburg.de/cgi-bin/Rwiki.pl?UsePictures
This page demonstrates the use of pictures and the use of a public image
server for hosting graphics files.
Also, there's a page:
On 6 Jun 2005 at 17:48, Sander Oom wrote:
... much snipped ...
The whole point of a gallery is to show something to the user before
the user knows what he is looking for. The R help functions currently
available are hopeless when you have a picture of a graph in your head
without knowing the
I agree that a wiki to facilitate submission of graph code could be very
effective! Still needs to be well protected against vandalism. Seems a
regular backup, to facilitate a clean restore, is the best approach.
Romain, would you be willing to set up a wiki within the gallery. Think
the wiki
point of
a wiki is to foster collaboration.
Just 2 cents . . .
~Nick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Sander Oom
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 2:37 AM
To: Chris Evans
Cc: R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [R] R Graph Gallery : categorization
Le 07.06.2005 12:36, Sander Oom a écrit :
I agree that a wiki to facilitate submission of graph code could be
very effective! Still needs to be well protected against vandalism.
Seems a regular backup, to facilitate a clean restore, is the best
approach.
Romain, would you be willing to set
Hi Romain,
You have stuck your neck out which is great. You are however not
responsible for all the work! Let others join in!
Thus a wiki could provide opportunities for other people to contribute!
I was suggesting that the wiki be used as a platform for people to
submit code examples and
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Sander Oom wrote:
Hi Romain,
You have stuck your neck out which is great. You are however not
responsible for all the work! Let others join in!
Thus a wiki could provide opportunities for other people to contribute!
I was suggesting that the wiki be used as a platform for
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Dan Bolser wrote:
...
I agree, but its hard to get people contributing without something
centralized (some central autohrity). The problem with the existing wiki
http://fawn.unibw-hamburg.de/cgi-bin/Rwiki.pl?RwikiHome
Is that it currenlty does not support images (afaik).
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, David Forrest wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Dan Bolser wrote:
...
I agree, but its hard to get people contributing without something
centralized (some central autohrity). The problem with the existing wiki
http://fawn.unibw-hamburg.de/cgi-bin/Rwiki.pl?RwikiHome
Is that it
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Dan Bolser wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, David Forrest wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Dan Bolser wrote:
...
I agree, but its hard to get people contributing without something
centralized (some central autohrity). The problem with the existing wiki
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Dan Bolser wrote:
...
http://fawn.unibw-hamburg.de/cgi-bin/Rwiki.pl?Tips_And_Examples
Great!
We would need an image bin to support this though (for the average user).
Hi Dan all
http://fawn.unibw-hamburg.de/cgi-bin/Rwiki.pl?UsePictures
This page demonstrates the use
Hello all,
It seems that the next improvement to the R Graph Gallery is
categorization of the graphics, that way each graph will be easier to
find. That step should be done *carefully* if we want to avoid the
opposite side-effect : graph not reachable through the categories.
That's why the
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Romain Francois wrote:
Hello all,
It seems that the next improvement to the R Graph Gallery is
categorization of the graphics, that way each graph will be easier to
find. That step should be done *carefully* if we want to avoid the
opposite side-effect : graph not
Romain Francois wrote:
Graphics will be classified in :
- categories
- sub-categories within those categories
So far so good.
Maybe, maybe not! Would a system of keywords work better than strict
hierarchical categories, as long as plots can have more than one keyword
attached? Someone
Romain Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all,
It seems that the next improvement to the R Graph Gallery is
categorization of the graphics, that way each graph will be easier to
find. That step should be done *carefully* if we want to avoid the
opposite side-effect : graph not
Le 06.06.2005 17:21, Peter Dalgaard a écrit :
Romain Francois [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello all,
It seems that the next improvement to the R Graph Gallery is
categorization of the graphics, that way each graph will be easier to
find. That step should be done *carefully* if we want to
Barry Rowlingson wrote:
Romain Francois wrote:
Graphics will be classified in :
- categories
- sub-categories within those categories
So far so good.
Maybe, maybe not! Would a system of keywords work better than strict
hierarchical categories, as long as plots can have more than one
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Sander Oom wrote:
Barry Rowlingson wrote:
Romain Francois wrote:
Graphics will be classified in :
- categories
- sub-categories within those categories
So far so good.
Maybe, maybe not! Would a system of keywords work better than strict
hierarchical
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Romain Francois wrote:
Le 06.06.2005 17:21, Peter Dalgaard a écrit :
...
BTW, shouldn't there a way there from http://addictedtor.free.fr ? I
seem to get stuck on the home page with nothing to click (except R
and the labels on the left).
Hello Peter,
My english
Le 06.06.2005 22:30, David Forrest a écrit :
BTW, shouldn't there a way there from http://addictedtor.free.fr ? I
seem to get stuck on the home page with nothing to click (except R
and the labels on the left).
Hello Peter,
My english fails me at understanding your question. I don't
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Dan Bolser wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Romain Francois wrote:
...
It seems that the next improvement to the R Graph Gallery is
categorization of the graphics, that way each graph will be easier to
find. That step should be done *carefully* if we want to avoid the
opposite
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, David Forrest wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Dan Bolser wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Romain Francois wrote:
...
It seems that the next improvement to the R Graph Gallery is
categorization of the graphics, that way each graph will be easier to
find. That step should be done
Romain Francois wrote:
Le 06.06.2005 22:30, David Forrest a écrit :
BTW, shouldn't there a way there from http://addictedtor.free.fr ? I
seem to get stuck on the home page with nothing to click (except R
and the labels on the left).
Hello Peter,
My english fails me at understanding
23 matches
Mail list logo
