Re: [R] R News, volume 7, issue 1 is now available --error in AMMI article

2007-04-25 Thread Lux Zhang
Hi, In this newsletter (Vol 7, 1),the article on AMMI by Onofri and Ciriofolo presented a AMMI function. One of arguments for this function AMMI (Page 17) is biplot. There is a biplot fucntion from {stats} package. I guess they are not the same. Could the authors clarify that? Thanks, Yuandan

Re: [R] R News, volume 7, issue 1 is now available --error in AMMI article

2007-04-26 Thread John Fox
nal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lux Zhang > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:38 AM > To: R-help; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [R] R News, volume 7,issue 1 is now available > --error in AMMI article > > Hi, > >

Re: [R] R News, volume 7, issue 1 is now available --error in AMMI article

2007-04-26 Thread Lux Zhang
Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lux Zhang > > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:38 AM > > To: R-help; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [R] R News, volume 7,issue 1 is now available > > --error in AMMI article >

Re: [R] R News, volume 7, issue 1 is now available --error in AMMI article

2007-04-26 Thread Lux Zhang
. Regards, > > John > > > > > > John Fox, Professor > > Department of Sociology > > McMaster University > > Hamilton, Ontario > > Canada L8S 4M4 > > 905-525-9140x23604 > > http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox > > ------------ > &g

Re: [R] R News, volume 7, issue 1 is now available --error in AMMI article

2007-04-26 Thread John Fox
/jfox > -Original Message- > From: Lux Zhang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:56 AM > To: John Fox > Cc: R-help > Subject: Re: [R] R News, volume 7,issue 1 is now available > --error in AMMI article > &

Re: [R] R News, volume 7, issue 1 is now available --error in AMMI article

2007-04-26 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 4/26/2007 7:55 AM, Lux Zhang wrote: > On 26/04/07, Lux Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 26/04/07, John Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > Dear Yuandan, >> > >> > My attention was drawn by your claim of an "error in AMMI article." >> > >> > As you say, the code for the AMMI f