Re: [R-sig-eco] Comparing results of two CCAs

2014-03-14 Thread Paolo Piras
Hi, maybe partial least squares: you can run two separate partial least squares analyses and then comparing vectors. best paolo Da: r-sig-ecology-boun...@r-project.org r-sig-ecology-boun...@r-project.org per conto di Eliot Miller eliotmil...@umsl.edu

Re: [R-sig-eco] Comparing results of two CCAs (Eliot Miller)

2014-03-14 Thread Highland Statistics Ltd
-- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 23:50:47 -0500 From: Eliot Miller eliotmil...@umsl.edu To: r-sig-ecology@r-project.org Subject: [R-sig-eco] Comparing results of two CCAs Message-ID:

Re: [R-sig-eco] Comparing results of two CCAs

2014-03-14 Thread Eliot Miller
The partial least squares sounds really promising, thanks. I now need to go read about and try some tests with it. If you or anyone else has a preferred implementation of this in R I'd be interested in hearing about it! Alain--can you elaborate on how I might be able to use variance partitioning?

Re: [R-sig-eco] Comparing results of two CCAs

2014-03-14 Thread Paolo Piras
PLS can be performed in pls package while varpart in vegan package however...could you explain a little bit better the specific hypothesis you want to test? Different methods are suited in dependence of the explicit hypothesis you set. Da:

Re: [R-sig-eco] Comparing results of two CCAs

2014-03-14 Thread Eliot Miller
Sure, thanks for the chance. I am interested in whether two separate evolutionary radiations have followed the same ecomorphological trajectory. Are the same morphological features associated with the same ecological features? I think so, but I also think in one of the radiations that the group

Re: [R-sig-eco] Comparing results of two CCAs

2014-03-14 Thread Eliot Miller
Ok, thanks a lot for the explanation! We are going to work on getting it running and see if it makes sense for us to continue with it. Really appreciate the input. Good paper here to walk me through it. Thanks so much! On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Paolo Piras paolo.pi...@uniroma3.itwrote: