Thank you Luis. When calibrating the adaptive model, using adapt=t in the
bandwidth selection created the proportion you speak of, which then allowed
me to create a bandwidth matrix using gwr.adapt. However, this has not
worked for me with holdout samples. Have you had success in this regard?
I do
Dear Paul,
I am dealing with this kind of problems right now, and if I am not wrong,
when you want to apply an adaptative bandwidth, you should introduce a
value for the "adapt" parameter instead of for the "bandwidth" parameter.
This value will be between 0 and 1 and indicates the proportion of c
Hi Folks,
I was curious if anyone has had experience applying an SPGWR model with an
adaptive bandwidth matrix to a holdout or validation sample. I am using the
"fit.points" command, which does not seem to allow for a new bandwidth
calibrated around the holdout samples XY coordinates. Any directio
Dear all,
Thanks for your help!
CRS() is working fine now:
> library(rgdal)
> My.Proj<-"+proj=tmerc +datum=WGS84 +lat_0=0 +lon_0=17 +x_0=60
+y_0=1000"
> CRS(My.Proj)
CRS arguments:
+proj=tmerc +datum=WGS84 +lat_0=0 +lon_0=17 +x_0=60 +y_0=1000
+ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0
an
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Pan wrote:
Dear Roger,
Thank you for your valuable suggestions. First, I tried to enter my.proj as
PROJ.4 string:
> MyProj.PROJ.4<-"+proj=UTM +datum=WGS84 +lon_0=17 +x_0=60
+y_0=1000"
>
> library(rgdal)
>
> CRS("+proj=UTM +lon_0=17 +x_0=60 +y_0=1000")
E
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Pan wrote:
> Dear Roger,
>
> Thank you for your valuable suggestions. First, I tried to enter my.proj as
> PROJ.4 string:
>
> > MyProj.PROJ.4<-"+proj=UTM +datum=WGS84 +lon_0=17 +x_0=60
> +y_0=1000"
> >
> > library(rgdal)
> >
> > CRS("+proj=UTM
Dear Roger,
Thank you for your valuable suggestions. First, I tried to enter my.proj as
PROJ.4 string:
> MyProj.PROJ.4<-"+proj=UTM +datum=WGS84 +lon_0=17 +x_0=60 +y_0=1000"
>
> library(rgdal)
>
> CRS("+proj=UTM +lon_0=17 +x_0=60 +y_0=1000")
Error in CRS("+proj=UTM +lon_
