Good catch.
I have no solution -- but I get the same problem on an earlier version of R
in a different environment (so it is not just because of your setup).
My session info is below.
Cheers,
Gareth.
sessionInfo()
R version 3.0.1 (2013-05-16)
Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit)
Dear Erin,
you might want to take a look at the gstat function variogramLine and set the
parameter covariance to TRUE. The argument dist_vector takes as well a
distance matrix and will then return a covariance matrix.
HTH, best wishes,
Ben
Hodgess, Erin hodge...@uhd.edu wrote:
Hi!
Here is
Erin,
http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de/~epebe_01/mstp/lec5.html
http://ifgi.uni-muenster.de/~epebe_01/mstp/lec7.html
contain some minimal, one-dimensional kriging functions that I used in
my class recently.
R markdown source files are on https://github.com/edzer/mstp
On 12/05/2013 04:36 AM,
Dear list, as in
the title, I found that when projecting a world map by mollweide projection and
setting a longitude value, some strange
parallels are drawn. The real problem is that these lines âinteractâ with a
raster when performing the âoverâ function.
How can I manage
it?
Here I
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Marcelino de la Cruz
marcelino.delac...@upm.es wrote:
..
The plot of the data published by Strauss (1975) was scanned and
digitised by Sandra Pereira, University of Western Australia, 2002.
So you can digitize yourself the original true coordinates from the
Thanks to all for the good help...it's great!
Sincerely,
Erin
From: r-sig-geo-boun...@r-project.org [r-sig-geo-boun...@r-project.org] on
behalf of Edzer Pebesma [edzer.pebe...@uni-muenster.de]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 2:56 AM
To:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Francesco Carotenuto wrote:
Dear list, as in
the title, I found that when projecting a world map by mollweide projection and
setting a?? longitude value, some strange
parallels are drawn. The real problem is that these lines ???interact??? with a
raster when performing the
Thank you for the answer.
The object is the prediction location in an interpolation process. The function
of overlay is involved in an automatic process and the longitude (and the
kind of projection too) can change according to the dataset that is, in some
cases, worldwide distributed.
Dr.
I just wonder if this is related to an existing resize problem when
overplotting? I see this on the windows() graphics device, you need to
try these two sets of plot commands and resize the window (especially
stretch it in one direction) to see the problem at ## 1 and ## 2
v - list(x = seq(0, 1,
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Francesco Carotenuto wrote:
Thank you for the answer. The object is the prediction location in an
interpolation process. The function of overlay is involved in an
automatic process and the longitude (and the kind of projection too) can
change according to the dataset that
Hi Michael,
Thanks for those thoughts.
The issue you raise (which has bit me before as well) appears to be
unrelated. In particular, your resizing issue disappears if one sets
useRaster=FALSE, whereas my problem persists whether or not rasterImage()
is used to draw the raster. Try this to get a
Interesting and difficult! Thanks for pointing out the useRaster
difference, I had mixed up TRUE/FALSE in my original report (offlist)
on that one. That might help me find the solution, though sorry I have
nothing for your issue. :)
Cheers, Mike.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Josh O'Brien
Lee De Cola ldec...@comcast.net writes:
does anyone know the original, true coordinates of the spatstat redwoodfull
data?
i can't find them in:
Strauss, D. J. (1975). A Model for Clustering. Biometrika 62(2): 467-475.
i think reporting spatial data in rescaled units is unscientific.
13 matches
Mail list logo
