Hi all,
I apologize in advance, I haven't the time today to comb the help list
for tips and hints, but does anyone know how to resample a 20 by 20m
grid so the operational spacing is down to a 10 by 10m grid?
Any assistance is MUCH appreciated!
--
David Depew
PhD Candidate
Department of Biolog
Just a quick question re: memory sizes.
Is it possible to quickly estimate the amount of RAM needed to do
ordinary kriging given a dataset of 14000 records for 2 variables?
--
David Depew
PhD Candidate
Department of Biology
University of Waterloo
200 University Ave W.
Waterloo, ON. Canada
N2L 3
A late follow up question to this thread
What if the local neighbor hood was restricted to the range of
autocorrelation? My impression was that values beyond that have little
weight in the interpolation anyways.
I realize that this is of course not statistically optimal, but for
those with
rever. The other issue in that question was, I suspect, lack of
standardization of coordinates, used in a trend surface.
--
Edzer
Dave Depew wrote:
Is there a limit to the # of observations or size of file that can
be co-kriged in gstat?
I have a ~12000 observation data set (2 variables), the variogram
Is there a limit to the # of observations or size of file that can be
co-kriged in gstat?
I have a ~12000 observation data set (2 variables), the variograms,
cross variogram and lmc are fit well, and co-kriging starts ok
Linear Model of Coregionalization found. Good.
[using ordinary cokriging]
A quick question for experienced gstat users
Can nested variograms be fit using gstat? if so, is it simply adding to
an existing variogram structure?
Thanks
--
David Depew
PhD Candidate
Department of Biology
University of Waterloo
200 University Ave W.
Waterloo, ON. Canada
N2L 3G1
(T) 1-
tion
of the kriging model - this seems to give reasonable estimates for mean
error, mean squared prediction error and mean square normalized error. I
had interpreted this that the variogram model chosen was doing a
reasonable job.
Edzer Pebesma wrote:
Hi Dave,
Dave Depew wrote:
Hi all,
A q
Hi all,
A question for the more experienced geostats users
I have a data set containing 2-3 variables relating to submerged plant
characteristics inferred from acoustic survey.
The distribution of the % cover variable is bounded (0-100) and highly
left skewed (many 0's). The transect spacin
I suppose it might be, although I expanded the neighborhood just to be
sure. I wonder if it isn;t the NA values that are in the grid
Edzer Pebesma wrote:
Is it possible that you're using kriging in a local neighbourhood
where the predictor is constant?
--
Edzer
Dave Depew wrote:
H
> I think I know what the issue isI have some NA cells in the
prediction grid. trying to do UK with NA cells may be the problem. IS
there a way to exclude these or remove them? I think they are present
due to transect spacing and the short range of the original OK done for
the covariate...
Hi
I'm trying to run some universal kriging, and have not experienced this
error before.
I've removed duplicate data locations using the remove.duplicates
command. The data set runs fine if the formula is set as ordinary
kriging, but adding in a predictor (which is already known at each grid
l
ariables. EUR 22904 EN Scientific and Technical Research
series, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,
Luxemburg, 143 pp.
http://bookshop.europa.eu/uri?target=EUB:NOTICE:LBNA22904:EN:HTML
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Dave Depew
Sent: Mon 6/16/20
Hi again,
I'm getting more confused regarding the "accepted" forms of detrending
data prior to kriging. I've used a GAM (package mgcv) to detrend my
target variable. The residuals from this 9th order polynomial are well
behaved (normal distribution, only mild heteroskedasticity). I realize
tha
://spatial-analyst.net
-Original Message-----
From: Dave Depew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dinsdag 17 juni 2008 14:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: r-sig-geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: re:kriging
Thanks Tom,
I've been able to fit a polynomial function to the data quite well. The
Thanks Tom,
I've been able to fit a polynomial function to the data quite well. The
residuals are behaving (i.e normal distribution and no skewness of
variance). I'm assuming this means that I could krige the residuals
(Ordinary K?) and then add the trend back to the predicted residual
grid? I
the
scope of universal kriging.
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Dave Depew wrote:
Hi all,
I have a data set that I would like to krige to interpolate between
transects. There is a non-linear trend between two of the variables...my
impression from reading the gstat help file is that there must be a
linear
Hi all,
I have a data set that I would like to krige to interpolate between
transects. There is a non-linear trend between two of the variables...my
impression from reading the gstat help file is that there must be a
linear relationship between the data to use universal kriging?
Second, would a
Thanks Edzer,
SO to confirm, the 45 deg direction is the maximum range of correlation,
or simply just the maximum range to determine the angle of anisotropy?
Edzer Pebesma wrote:
Dave Depew wrote:
Hi All,
I suppose this is a rather simple question...however, I'm managing to
get
Hi All,
I suppose this is a rather simple question...however, I'm managing to
get more confused the more I read.
I'm doing some OK and UK using the R-gstat package...I have some data
that is moderately anisotropic. Reading the gstat literature, it would
seem that to specify the appropriate para
"]]<0.5)
{meuse.grid[["class"]]=10*meuse.grid[["dist]]} else
{meuse.grid[["class"]]=100* meuse.grid[["dist"]]}
}
Edzer Pebesma wrote:
Dave Depew wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a question regarding kriging outputs. I have an interpolated
dataset which due to t
Hi all,
I've got a question regarding kriging outputs. I have an interpolated
dataset which due to the nugget effect contains some negative values as
the predictions. I would like to truncate these @ "0", rather than
having them as a negative prediction.
I've tried something similar with the m
21 matches
Mail list logo