are the fit points. In your case, and with a 20km fixed bandwidth,
you most likely only have the i'th observations in their own local
regressions.
Hope this helps more,
Roger
Hope this helps,
Roger
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Dr. Danlin Yu
On 2010-9-30 12:53, Jorge Fernando Saraiva de
Dear list,
When I run a gwr using a model with two independent variables my local R2
only has NA values. I've read in some topic that this is problably because
the function cannot estimate localR2 correctly.
I tryed to get the same result with the columbus data, but was not able to.
Does anyone
Dear list,
I have a raster, with a grid resolution of 250m2 and values of 0,1 or NA,
and a shapefile with about 5000 polygons of areas varying from 221m2 to
323,629,571,955m2, which means that a polygon might have 1 billion cells
(fortunaly, these are very few)
I would like to obtain for each
Dear all,
I have started to use gwr in data of species counts in islands of the
western hemisphere, but the gwr() output contains negative locals R2s,
especially when bandwith value are low. This happen also when I use the
optimal bandwidth choosed by gwr.sel() with CV. Does anybody knows what
