Its better than no package at all, right? I think this is a metadata
issue. If packages were keyworded a la Gentoo, users could mask out
packages that don't pass R package checks, etc. (Maybe that's already in
place. I haven't tracked closely recent changes in R.)
THK
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 08:32
Hi Roger,
I'm sorry, I didn't want to bash the "R-spatial" project at all.
I think it's great that you do lead and coordinate this
initiative, with such a high quality.
I somewhat got carried away by the fact (more general) that
people "publish R packages" but are too lazy to make them pass R
CMD
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Martin Maechler wrote:
> > "Hisaji" == Hisaji ONO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > on Sat, 20 Aug 2005 23:28:44 +0900 (JST) writes:
>
> Hisaji> Hello.
> Hisaji> Latest spgwr seems to be very attractive.
>
> Hisaji> However it will only release in source.
>
>
> "Hisaji" == Hisaji ONO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Sat, 20 Aug 2005 23:28:44 +0900 (JST) writes:
Hisaji> Hello.
Hisaji> Latest spgwr seems to be very attractive.
Hisaji> However it will only release in source.
Hisaji> When will be this and other(spmaptools etc.) win bi
Hello.
Latest spgwr seems to be very attractive.
However it will only release in source.
When will be this and other(spmaptools etc.) win binaries
available?
Regards.
___
R-sig-Geo mailing list
R-sig-Geo@stat.math.ethz.ch
https://stat.ethz.ch/ma
