Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-20 Thread Patrick Bolger
Beautiful! Thanks for that! I'm gonna post that on my office door. Poor T-Rex ;) -Pat On 2010-12-13, at 12:04 PM, Ben Bolker wrote: > On 10-12-13 01:49 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: >> >> >> The phrase ``to beg the question'' means to indulge in circular reasoning; >> to assume what is to be proven.

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-20 Thread Ben Bolker
On 10-12-13 01:49 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: > > > The phrase ``to beg the question'' means to indulge in circular reasoning; > to assume what is to be proven. Unfortunately that meaning is becoming lost > in the wilderness of ignorance that surrounds us, and the phrase is almost > universally used

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-13 Thread Carl Witthoft
Rolf -- you da man! Based on the literary quality of your epistle below, I will be sure to call upon your services should I ever need some some organization to be sokaled. Carl On 12/13/10 1:49 PM, Rolf Turner wrote: On 13/12/2010, at 10:05 PM, Jari Oksanen wrote: I just wonder why th

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-13 Thread Rolf Turner
On 13/12/2010, at 10:05 PM, Jari Oksanen wrote: > On 13/12/10 10:56 AM, "Philippe Grosjean" wrote: > >> Ah! That is interesting! >> > ... >> >> Otherwise, I am always amazed that people could use a metaphor like >> here, a reference to the shape of a curve on a graph, without even >> knowing

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-13 Thread Erich Neuwirth
And of course the inverse of a flat curve (assuming it is an invertible function) always is a steep curve. So steepness or flatness depends on your choice of axes. If you plot "amount to be learned" on the x-axis and "time needed" on the y-axis, you also get a steep curve. On 12/13/2010 10:05 AM

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-13 Thread Jari Oksanen
On 13/12/10 10:56 AM, "Philippe Grosjean" wrote: > Ah! That is interesting! > ... > > Otherwise, I am always amazed that people could use a metaphor like > here, a reference to the shape of a curve on a graph, without even > knowing what exactly are the X- and Y-axes. Shame on us! Nothing to be

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-13 Thread Philippe Grosjean
Ah! That is interesting! For me, the learning curve is like the energy required for a chemical or a biochemical reaction to occur. Thus, on the X-axis, you could have the amount of R learned/assimilated, and on the Y-axis, you have the energy/effort/time (or whatever measure of learning effort

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-12 Thread William Revelle
I share with Carl about the misuse of the term learning curve. The original derivation was from learning theory where one plotted number of correct responses on the y axis against trial number on the x axis. Steep learning curves thus implied rapid learning (of easy material). Flat learning

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-12 Thread John Maindonald
Surely what is envisaged is the sheer effort involved in climbing a step mountain side. It does not have a graph in mind. If one wants to change the metaphor and turn it into a graph, it is not at all obvious what the horizontal axis ought to be, though various rather strained interpretations

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-11 Thread Berend Hasselman
On 10-12-2010, at 22:25, Rolf Turner wrote: > > I agree with you completely about ``begging the question''. The > nearly universal misuse of this expression drives me crazy. I'm > not so sure about ``steep learning curve'' however. My impression > is that this phrase has *always* been used to

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-11 Thread Christophe Dutang
There are many levels of knowledge/skills of R, the first levels are quick to do. But next levels are harder to pass. I will say in a sentence that R is easy to learn but difficult to master, which applies to many things (danse, music, sport, ...)! Christophe -- Christophe Dutang Ph.D. student

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-11 Thread baptiste auguie
On 11 December 2010 13:54, Pfister wrote: > So a "steep" learning curve implies "easy to learn" Shouldn't that be "quick to learn"? My own experience with R would suggest that easy and quick are not always synonymous (eureka moment). I tend to think the R learning curve qualifies as steep becaus

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-11 Thread Pfister
Carl Witthoft Cc: "r-sig-mac@r-project.org" Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I agree with you completely about ``begging the question''. The nearly universal misuse of this expression drives me crazy. I&#x

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-10 Thread Rolf Turner
I agree with you completely about ``begging the question''. The nearly universal misuse of this expression drives me crazy. I'm not so sure about ``steep learning curve'' however. My impression is that this phrase has *always* been used to convey the idea that a subject area is difficult to lea

Re: [R-SIG-Mac] learning R

2010-12-10 Thread Carl Witthoft
Next to "begging the question," the phrase "steep learning curve" is probably the most misused cliche out there. A 'learning curve' represents knowledge (or understanding) as a function of time. THerefore, the steeper the better. Please help save the English language from descent into Humpty-