Yes, it is already included in the .gitignore file. I guess I meant
it's not special to _Racket_, but it is useful to have a convention
for stuff like git and helping others. :)
Jay
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> PS The 'extra-pkgs' directory is a tiny bit special:
PS The 'extra-pkgs' directory is a tiny bit special:
http://docs.racket-lang.org/pkg/git-workflow.html?q=git#%28part._clone-link%29
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Jay McCarthy
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Anthony Carrico
> wrote:
> > On 06/19/2015 11:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Anthony Carrico wrote:
> On 06/19/2015 11:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>> With this release we are taking a major step forward to get our user
>> community even more involved than in the past...
>
> It looks like I'm running currently running a snapshot. I've ran f
Here is the overview of the work that I recently sent out internally.
I started out with a pure-functional scripting interface, but it very rapidly
became imperative, and it is in heavy flux. The sample scripts do capture the
general "flavor" that I want this to have -- I think it will be easy
On 06/23/2015 07:36 PM, John Carmack wrote:
The intersection of Gear VR owners and Racket users may consist of just
me at the moment, but if anyone else here is interested in discussing
the work I am doing with driving VR by Racket/Scheme, I would welcome
the input. Would that be an appropriate
We welcome all posts connected to Racket. Post away. -- Matthias
p.s. The question is whether you get suitable feedback. My life is so abstract,
I sometimes wonder what reality is :-)
On Jun 23, 2015, at 7:36 PM, John Carmack wrote:
> The intersection of Gear VR owners and Racket users may
The intersection of Gear VR owners and Racket users may consist of just me at
the moment, but if anyone else here is interested in discussing the work I am
doing with driving VR by Racket/Scheme, I would welcome the input. Would that
be an appropriate topic on the list?
--
You received this m
On 06/23/2015 04:26 PM, Anthony Carrico wrote:
> On 06/19/2015 11:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
>> With this release we are taking a major step forward to get our user
>> community even more involved than in the past...
>
> It looks like I'm running currently running a snapshot. I've ran from
> git
I ran into this issue recently. The right answer for me was to write a
trampolining macro. define-values is treated specially by the macro
expander and thus can't be handled easily in a local expand. The pattern I
ended up using (adapted from an old mailing list post by Ryan and a
discussion with M
Based on the documentation, I thought that the right answer would be
`(list (gensym))` but that didn't work -- hopefully someone else
knows.
Sam
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Thomas Dickerson
wrote:
> I thought that might be the case, but the documentation is pretty dense (and
> self-referent
I thought that might be the case, but the documentation is pretty dense
(and self-referential), so it's not clear what the correct value for that
argument is.
Thomas Dickerson
Brown University
Department of Computer Science
115 Waterman St, 4th Floor
Providence, RI 02912
802-458-0637
On Tue, Ju
On 06/19/2015 11:19 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> With this release we are taking a major step forward to get our user
> community even more involved than in the past...
It looks like I'm running currently running a snapshot. I've ran from
github before, but I'll admit I'm not sure where I'd go to u
To fix your last issue, you probably want to provide a different value as
the `context-v` argument (the 2nd one) to `local-expand`.
Sam
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:46 PM Thomas Dickerson
wrote:
> Okay - for posterity's sake, here's an updated version of Alex's code that
> supports nested Loop/Acc
Okay - for posterity's sake, here's an updated version of Alex's code that
supports nested Loop/Accum, and doesn't leave any "syntactic residue" after
expansion. This is now what I set out to accomplish with my original set of
questions:
> #lang racket/base
>
> (require racket/stxparam
>
đź‘Ťđź‘Ť. Awesome that Racket keeps pushing the envelope on
meta-programming. It /is/ exciting. I'm somewhat quiet because I'm still
absorbing it as I get the time. There has been chatter on IRC too. Also,
very cool that mflatt is being so open with the community during the dev
cycle. Bring it on.
--
A
John Carmack:
> My son's game has a level editor as well as a game loop, and we switch
> between them. However, each new big-bang call creates a new window,
> leaving the previous ones inert on the screen. How can we close the
> windows?
>
Matthias Felleisen:
>
> But people wanted it to stay
>
Excited!
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> On 06/22/2015 08:25 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>>
>> At Thu, 21 May 2015 07:15:14 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>>>
>>> Otherwise, be prepared for me to come back in a few
>>> weeks and lobby for moving to a new macro expander.
>>
>>
>>
Yes, that should be fine. One note about your sample code: the isolation
mode of inner transactions must be #f (the default); you can't change
isolation levels once you've started an outer transaction. Also keep in
mind that nested transactions are not supported for ODBC connections.
Ryan
On
Hi,
This is Aanchal from Technology resource Group. Below is the job
description and requirements for your perusal and please contact me if
having any questions or concerns.
*If you are available and meet the requirements please respond with
your updated resume in a Microsoft Word formatted docum
I, for one, thought the idea of “OS” reads and writes from Get Bonus was a neat
abstraction, even if it is more or less just functional reads and writes to a
giant hash table. Obviously that’s more complicated than would be appropriate
for big-bang, but I thought I’d bring it up anyway.
> On Ju
I have for years hoped to find time to think about 'distributing state' over
handlers in big-bang because I am perfectly aware of the scaling up
limitations. Your hashtable idea might be worth exploring. Tony and I are also
considering his actor system as a source of ideas. This may also give u
Hi Partners,
This is Aanchal from Technology resource Group. Below is the job
description and requirements for your perusal and please contact me if
having any questions or concerns.
*Role: WebSphere Commerce Architect*
*Location: San Francisco, CA*
*Duration: 6 Months (Extension possible) and
On 06/22/2015 08:25 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Thu, 21 May 2015 07:15:14 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Otherwise, be prepared for me to come back in a few
weeks and lobby for moving to a new macro expander.
Here's the proposal: let's switch on July 16. "Switch" means that I'd
merge the new macr
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 8:30:32 AM UTC-4, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Providing #f as the third argument to `local-expand` means that
>
> (+ i j)
>
> is expanded only as far as exposing the primitive function-call form, also
> known as `#%plain-app`:
>
> (#%plain-app + i j)
>
> When `i` is e
It solved itself: I had forgotten to set the `Content-Type` of the POST
request.
Here's a working example of cookies in action:
http://www.bahmanm.com/blogs/grab-packt-racket-scheme
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscri
Providing #f as the third argument to `local-expand` means that
(+ i j)
is expanded only as far as exposing the primitive function-call form, also
known as `#%plain-app`:
(#%plain-app + i j)
When `i` is encountered later, there's no binding in the compile-time
environment, because the intern
26 matches
Mail list logo
