>
> Virtualbox -> Linux -> Docker -> Alpine
>^
>
> Which Linux distro?
>
> I'm asking because the usual Racket errors in distros with grsecurity
> are pretty easy to workaround. These errors affect to every JIT, not
> only to Racket.
>
> If you're running a non-grsecurity
On 09/04/2015 07:29 PM, Jack Firth wrote:
On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 10:27:12 AM UTC-7, Jack Firth wrote:
On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 8:23:14 AM UTC-7, Juan Francisco Cantero
Hurtado wrote:
On 09/04/2015 04:59 PM, Jack Firth wrote:
On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 4:51:43 AM UTC-7, Ju
On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 10:27:12 AM UTC-7, Jack Firth wrote:
> On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 8:23:14 AM UTC-7, Juan Francisco Cantero
> Hurtado wrote:
> > On 09/04/2015 04:59 PM, Jack Firth wrote:
> > > On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 4:51:43 AM UTC-7, Juan Francisco Cantero
> > > Hurta
On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 8:23:14 AM UTC-7, Juan Francisco Cantero
Hurtado wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 04:59 PM, Jack Firth wrote:
> > On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 4:51:43 AM UTC-7, Juan Francisco Cantero
> > Hurtado wrote:
> >> On 09/03/2015 08:07 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
> >>> I've attempted t
On 09/04/2015 04:59 PM, Jack Firth wrote:
On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 4:51:43 AM UTC-7, Juan Francisco Cantero
Hurtado wrote:
On 09/03/2015 08:07 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
I've attempted to compile from source in an alpine image, but with no success.
There's a bit too much arcane magic there
On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 4:51:43 AM UTC-7, Juan Francisco Cantero
Hurtado wrote:
> On 09/03/2015 08:07 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
> > I've attempted to compile from source in an alpine image, but with no
> > success. There's a bit too much arcane magic there for me to figure out how
> > to do
Alexander D. Knauth writes:
> > At least it's one that works. It feels like cheating to use dynamic
> > scoping to get around a problem with lexical scoping, but knowing when
> > to cheat is a fundamental competence when dealing with any bureaucracy ;-)
>
> Um, the reason a syntax parameter
On Friday, September 4, 2015 at 9:31:36 AM UTC-4, Michael Myers wrote:
> You might want to take a look at https://github.com/mromyers/automata
> specifically, https://github.com/mromyers/automata/blob/master/examples.rkt
> and https://github.com/mromyers/automata/blob/master/machines.rkt
>
> I mor
Racket's syntax-expander deliberately goes out of its way to break exactly
this example. ("hygiene")
The issue/bug/ambiguity it is protecting you from is:
(let ((send (lambda args (length args)) ))
(def (foo3 x y)
(send x + y)
))
(foo3 2 3) ;; In lisps with poor grooming, 5.
You might want to take a look at https://github.com/mromyers/automata
specifically, https://github.com/mromyers/automata/blob/master/examples.rkt
and https://github.com/mromyers/automata/blob/master/machines.rkt
I more or less just use the definition that was in my textbook: you provide
a transit
On 09/03/2015 08:07 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
I've attempted to compile from source in an alpine image, but with no success.
There's a bit too much arcane magic there for me to figure out how to do that.
Can you show the errors on Alpine? Are you using Alpine in a container
or in a virtual/real
> On Sep 4, 2015, at 4:26 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
>
> Brian Mastenbrook writes:
>
>> It's a capture problem. In the first case, you're just binding the
>> name "send" locally and all is well. In the second case, you're
>> trying to introduce a binding for "send" that you didn't get from
>> the
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have just tried to HEAD a web server, and have come across a few
> issues around the use of head-pure-port:
>
> 1. What is the point of `head-pure-port'? The HTTP server should not
>(must not?) send a body. Which means that once t
Dear mrmyers, I cloned your repo however it's true that i complete have no
idea about macro yet. It'd be nice for further reading as i'd work on this
problem for long.
As soegaard suggests on IRC, to avoid the problem of creating new machines
after every interaction, i'd try to make the struct #:m
Hi Linh,
There are many different representations of finite state machines.
If you "just" need to simulate a single machine, a simple and efficient
approach is to represent each state as a Racket function (see example
below).
#lang racket
(require racket/generator)
;; The turn-stile example fro
Brian Mastenbrook writes:
> It's a capture problem. In the first case, you're just binding the
> name "send" locally and all is well. In the second case, you're
> trying to introduce a binding for "send" that you didn't get from
> the input form.
Ahhh that one has bitten me before, but I
Folks,
I have just tried to HEAD a web server, and have come across a few
issues around the use of head-pure-port:
1. What is the point of `head-pure-port'? The HTTP server should not
(must not?) send a body. Which means that once the port is purified,
`head-pure-port' returns nothing. So i
17 matches
Mail list logo
